Walker Audio Prelude LP Cleaning Solution


I did not want to post this as a full review as this is my initial first impression using the newly released Walker Audio Prelude LP Cleaning Solutions.

Prelude is a 3-step process consisting of enzymes, premixed cleaning solution and an ultra pure water rinse (made via a 7 stage filtration process). I comes nicely packaged with the following: a 64 ounce container of ultra pure water, a 16 ounce squeeze bottle of premixed cleaning solution, a second bottle of water in a 16 ounce squeeze bottle, an empty 4 ounce squeeze bottle, and a jar of enzyme powder, along with a small scoop and a slightly larger scoop.

Lloyd’s research indicates that enzymes in a solution only have a life cycle of 8-10 hours before they die off. By keeping the enzymes in a powder form, and only mixing enough to be used during a cleaning session ensures they stay active.

If you plan on cleaning 5-6 or so LP sides at a time (which is what I have been doing), use the small scoop in the enzyme powder. Place the powder in the empty 4-ounce bottle. Add some of the water from the 16-ounce container up to the “A” mark on the 4-ounce bottle and shake to mix. Apply to the pads of a cleaning brush and lightly scrub the LP as it spins on your RCM. Let it sit for 15-30 seconds and vacuum off.

Using a second brush, apply the premixed cleaning solution to the pad and apply to the LP as above. Let sit for a few seconds and vacuum off. Do not let either solution dry on the LP.

Using a third brush, use the ultra pure water as a final rinse and vacuum off.

I have had lots of experience with different LP cleaning products, including Disc Doctor, Audio Intelligent, and L’Art du Son. The AI solutions are similar to Prelude in that they also use the enzyme solution as a pre-treat prior to cleaning. The AI enzyme come premixed, unlike the Prelude. The enzyme powder formula of Prelude ensures that the enzymes stay viable until they are needed. I really like the AI solutions when I used them, and missed them when Paul sold the business.

That said, The Walker Audio Prelude is the best of the AI, kicked up several notches. Lloyd Walker has hit another one out of the ballpark. After cleaning several LPs that I thought I knew backward and forward, I can report the following: surfaces are dead silent, with no residue what so ever from any of the three steps. There is no static build up, and even well played LPs have that shiny right out of the sleeve look to them.

Focus, detail and transparency are the first three words that come to mind when describing what I am hearing. The inner detail on familiar LPs lets me hear for the first time things that have been there but never fleshed out of the grooves the way it is after using Prelude. At least, that's what MY ears are telling me. The music just leaps out from the utter blackness of the grooves. And, your records are REALLY clean. What else could you expect from one of the true masters of the analog arts? Who better to bring such a great product to the market for LP lovers than the man who builds what I consider to be the finest LP playback product in the world?

Give Lloyd a call and talk to him yourself about Walker Audio Prelude. I have no financial connection to Walker Audio other than the fact that I am a very happy customer and use many of their products in my system.

Kudos to Lloyd, Felicia, and Fred for creating another great Walker Audio product.
slipknot1
Clarets2: Frankly, I have not found any organic compound that was impervious to a good record cleaning & steaming. My all time favorite cleaner is "Disc Doctor". The H2O used to dilute the cleaner and make steam is critical to the process , that is why I purchase my H2O from Prestone or Peak via a local autoparts store. Read Michael Fremers March /03 Stereophile article outlining the use of the "Hotshot" to clean used records. Mickey likes it ! And remember this ; even if the stuff you clean vinyl with is ,unfortunately, "snakeoil" steaming most likely shall remove its traces before playtime.
I have not tried the Walker enzyme product just yet, but am planning to. Inthe mean time I adda few commetns on cleaning records. Having lived with the ELP laser player as well as a more conventional tt/arm setup it is clear that the ELP will instantly reveal any foreign substance on the record (just read the ELP reviews). I use the Loricraft RCM and have tired the Disc Dr, Premier,Smart Devices, Buggtussel and AI solutions along with the DD brushes.I have tried all sorts combuindations of these chemicals.
The one combination that, so far, has resulted in almost flawlessly clean reocrds (to where the ELP is nearly as silent as a cd) is:

- mix up concentrated Buggtussell formula using 12-20 drops of the concnetrate per 2 oz of distiled water. Distribute this on record and let sit for 2-5 minutes
-with Buggtussel still on record, distribute generous quantity of Smart Devices 'High Potentcy' cleaner. Scrub this with DD brush back and forth over entire record surface for apprx 60 seconds.
- vacuum off solution and immediately apply 'regular' strength Smart Devices solution. Spin the record and apply DD brush for 10-20 seconds, then vacumm off.
- apply rinse of pure distilled water using second DD brush. Spni record 10-20 seconds while applying DD brush. Vacumm the H20 off.

This process has resulted in remarkably clean records, to where i only hear the occaisional pop/tick using the ELP and virtual silence on the regular tt.. I had tried the same process but using AI enzymer formula intead of the super concentrated Buggtussel and using the AI cleaning solutions. The resutls were nowhere near as good. I will get some Walker Prelude and see how it compares.
As for NASA folks, they are SOME of the same that put robots on places far too distant to appreciate with the naked eye but they do. Remember, they sought me out after experimenting with the idea.

Yeah, right. If you are saying that NASA is spending my tax dollars to test the efficacy of steam clenaing vinyl records, THAT is crazy talk.

Unless I am corrected by the results of independent research that throws up strong possibilities that I haven't considered, I'll continue to regard this method as equivalent to the "demagnetizing" of vinyl records.

Don't hold your breath. The enzyme makers are more interested in marketing research than scientific research.
Maclogan, what is this "demagnetizing" your records? Do you mean removing the static electricity? If so, certainly you don't mean what you say.