A "house sound" among turntable manufacturers ?
Interesting. Here's a side-by-side comparison where a half-as-expensive rig killed the giant killer: http://www.tnt-audio.com/sorgenti/technics_sl1200_2_e.html It was a Technics SL1200 with KAB mods. After a 3-turntable shootout, this is the turntable the reviewer bought. |
Mark and Undertow: Your points are well taken, and before initiating this thread, I was well aware of the potential here for opening the proverbial can of worms. I have tried to minimize that tendency by emphasizing conditions where either other variables have been held constant or when a number of those owning the same table for some time have reached virtually identical conclusions about its aural traits. Obviously, experiences of the first kind are typically uncommon. Being able to set the stage for this sort of scenario is not an easy proposition for a number of reasons. Though the somewhat less objective second scenario has its limitations, at least it might hopefully provide SOME kind of collective view that underscores a measure of familiarity with the table's sound. Yes, it's a tough road to hoe, and I certainly don't expect definitiveness here. Mark, in the site's article you make reference to---"How to Buy Analog"---the author himself describes some of the sound characteristics of several brands of tables. His observations may have been drawn based on a reasonably objective process of comparison, but without his telling me, I honestly don't know. That notwithstanding, I contend, as do many, that at one time or another probably all audiophile hobbyists and sellers of audio equipment, have asserted views, impressions and/or conclusions about components without having engaged the most objective methods of comparison. But I'm not interested in criticizing or faulting anyone here. And I'm not looking for anyone to tell me what component is "better than the others". I just thought it would be enjoyable to have a little light enlightenment on some reasonably reliable impressions of some of the turntable offerings in the marketplace. So, I welcome the comments of anyone who wishes to offer his or her two cents. |
Johnnyb53, Nice... And totally I can agree with you, However Sorry to tell you that Has nothing to do with the MMF 9 . "1" ... Thats an old MMF 9 which is Not the same, even the MMF 7 in my opinion was better than the MMF 9 for the money, and the MMF 7 competes pretty well with the Technics... The new Motor, Speed control, 100% carbon arm on the NEW 2007 MMF 9.1 will easily compete with the direct drive in control now.. I have had the 1200 but not a KAB version and sure for 400 bucks is good unit.. But its no MMF 9.1 sorry to say, just wanted to make sure that everyone was very clear its a totally different unit than the link you refer. Opus88 , I get ya'... I have heard and read totally opposites on every piece of equipment in the world from differing people, so maybe some good answers will be given to you here.. |
Hi Opus88, The site I refered you to is a dealer who advertises here on Audiogon. I have found it interesting that they feel comfortable in making descriptive assessments for potential buyers shopping by the internet. I can not judge the comparative statements that they have made, but presume that it must be some help to some shoppers. I have a Linn LP12 that I bought new in 1979 or 80. I have it upgraded with the Lingo power supply, Cetech subchassis, Graham 2.2 tonearm & armboard, Shelter 90X cartridge and Living Voices mat. It is sitting on a Target wall mount shelf bracket and Nuenace shelf. I use a Purist Audio Venustas tonearm cable to my pre-amp. I like the sound, it is very natural, smooth, with good inner & transient details. I have shopped some other tables up to the price I paid for the Linn, and really like the Rega sound. I find it very much like the Linn, slightly reduced in both price and quality of sound. I have listened to Music Hall, and did not like it. I have listened to a Michele Gyro, and found it very smooth and accurate, but not engaging. I like the VPI Scout, finding many similarities to my Linn. The Scout has more dynamics, but also brings a little more surface noise to the party. My Linn is still slightly ahead of the APL/Denon 3910 that I have, but the APL is now out for the latest updates. I wish to replace the Linn. I am looking for a more solid bottom end, more dynamics, and even more inner & transient detail. I think I will end up with a high mass table, like a Galiber Design Gavia, TW Acoustic Raven One, Brinkmann, or who knows what. Good luck, Mark |
