Tri Planar / ZYX Universe soundstaging


My question in simplistic terms; does the above combo have a more pronounced (smaller) sweet spot? Is that a trade off for either of these components or other products at this level?

I would think not but here is why I ask.

Currently in mid-stride with my analog rig, I added a TriPlanar 7 to my Aries2 with the Universe (X low output). After spending some time with the setup I found a point of adjustment where things sound good in the center sweet spot but there is a slight but noticeable change in focas moving off center. Its different than with the 10.5, as it should be in some ways, and it is different than from sources as well.

This is a temporary situation and I may have a different table in a few more weeks.

What I am experiencing just enough to ask the question. With all the adjustments on the Tri to dial it in and using the Universe, should you expect a fantastic sweet spot with more fall off away from there?

Thanks for your input, Terry
tdaudio
The short answer to your first question is, "yes", and it's direct evidence of the TriPlanar's superior imaging (a function of its more stable azimuth, which produces lower crosstalk when properly adjusted).

A component that allows higher and more variable crosstalk (JMW) will produce fuzzier and less stable images across a broader listening zone than a component with lower and more stable crosstalk (TP). The TP sends better-differentiated information to each speaker (especially the tweeters) so smaller differences in listening position become more audible.

With all the adjustments on the Tri to dial it in and using the Universe, should you expect a fantastic sweet spot with more fall off away from there?
In my experience, yes to both questions - depending on the speakers.

Speakers image differently, depending on their HF extension and phase coherency. We both have first order mid-tweeter Xovers and exceptional HF extension, so I'd expect great imaging from both our speakers.

Different speakers also produce different sized sweet spots, depending on their off-axis HF rolloff. I don't know about your ribbons but images change in my setup if I move my head L or R by just an inch. Soundstage depth and image integration are nearly as sensitive to fore/aft head movements. OTOH, our off-center listening seats have very indifferent imaging, or no imaging at all.
My experience with the combination is that it can image much the same way that analog tape does.
Thank you Doug, this is new and interesting. BTW I run Vandy 5As which I think highlight this effect to some degree wth their first order xovers.
Atmasphere, could you elaborate more on how this similar to imaging from analog tape. I assume you are refering to master tapes?

Thanks Terry