Denon 103r ????


I have made some improvement to my 103r, but am still getting tonal imbalance with this cartridge.
It's too bright and edgy on some recordings!
At times it sounds incredible, excellent imaging and sound stage.
What do I do though to tame down the brightness. Change the tracking force a bit or tracking angle, change the loading, impedence or capacitance. Add more tonearm bearing fluid or remove?
pedrillo
Kenyonbm,
The tweaks can be seen in my virtual system posted here.
Take a look at the tonearm, you will see a straw and a tiny canister. Inside each one is leadshot and some wire and tiny nails. Wire and nails is in there to resonate and then the leadshot dampens it. Not sure if that is really happening but I do know the added weight helps the cartridge since it is low comlpiance.
Hope this helps.
Again this is an amazing cartridge, looking forward to my next upgrade(cartridge).
Pedrillo,sorry to change the subject,but what happened with your interest with the RS-1's?
Raul, I would be happy to take that 103 youv'e been holding on to all these years off of your hands.... my 103 is off to soundsmith, my 103r nuded is playing now... I consulted a witch doctor, and after sacrificing a few chickens, have exorcised the stridency out of it (for the most part) Bottom line, I was perfectly happy with the stock 103, heard how much 'better' the 103r was... and yes, it is 'better' in many ways, but also 'worse' in some. I pine for a plain ol' unmodded 103... let me know if you still have it, and don't want it, cheers Harv
Adjust your VTA to a lower setting (drop the back of the tone arm down) removes the bright edgy sound from the DL103R sound.

With the tome arm too high, you get a bright and thin strident sound with no bass definition at all. Imaging is poor, too. Adjust the cartridge right, and it is one smooth operator. I love mine.
Well, I never could get the 103R to get to really good on my Quatros. Over time, and several records, it always tended to sound slightly closed-in on the midrange and blurry. I switched out to the Accuphase AC-2 I had, and it was WAY better on definition and clarity.

I think that the conical stylus and low low compliance just won't let it happen on my set-up (SME III arm) and is generally better at the low-end based on the shape of the grooves in the record. Yes, the 103R can be better on a heavier arm, but the balance of the cartridge will always bias the low-end...by design.

What I need to do, is find a comparable compliance MC that has the timber of my AC-2. But, where to start?