Science & Sound, Tube or Solid State Phono?


I have heard that for very low level signals solid state will be better than tubes. I am curious as to the impressions out there. I would love to know from a theoretical point of view that is made for the layman what is better or what are the strengths of each. I would also like to know if anyone has compared similar price high end phonos both tube & solid state and had a preference and why? Does the choice depend on the cartridge in use?
dgad
Dear Dgad: +++++ " Does the choice depend on the cartridge in use? " +++++

IMHO a full well designed Phonolinepreamp is a design for any cartridge , its quality performance depended only on its own good thinking design and its design execution not with which cartridge is used. From my point of view a Phonolinepreamp must be a Universal-use one it does not matter MC/MM type cartridge, output cartridge level or anything else.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Well, as always, YMMV. I have joined Lloyd Walker's camp that for LOMC cartridges, SS is the best bet. I am a tube fan, I do use a tube line stage and a tube amplifier, but I do agree with Lloyd, that for very small voltages, SS may be a more stable solution. FWIW, my cartridge outputs 0.24 mV.

Cheers,
John
Nick Doshi does the same for his MC gain stage, SS that is. From what I understand it is not easy to do, but when done right it works very well. The rest is all tubes.

I owned a phonostage once that did all of the gain stages in tubes. No SS, no transformers. Significantly more noisey. It lacked finese and other things as well.

I agree with Raul, the choice in cartridge shouldn't matter if the phonostage is done correctly.