Thanks for all the input guys.
A few years ago I replaced the leads with the factory stock but I did some surgery to the arm as well. The gentleman at Sakura Systems suggested that
I may want to discard the junction box behind the cartridge leads and simply go direct from cartridge to RCA at the base. This resulted in an improvement in sound because of one less connection in the signal path. The only downside is
that I had to increase the tracking force. Also, I don't have as much leeway weight-wise as before. This is because the arm is effectively lighter now that the junction box has been removed. If I were to buy a new RS A1 arm I would do it again because of the gain in transparancy.
Now I am thinking that if I were to remove the RCA junction at the base, and
proceed with one long lead directly to the pre, I would gain some more transparancy.
Dickson that Acrotec wire sounds interesting, it seems thin enough.
Thanks again guys, and I do recommend the removal of the junction box behind the cartridge leads.
Cheers,
A few years ago I replaced the leads with the factory stock but I did some surgery to the arm as well. The gentleman at Sakura Systems suggested that
I may want to discard the junction box behind the cartridge leads and simply go direct from cartridge to RCA at the base. This resulted in an improvement in sound because of one less connection in the signal path. The only downside is
that I had to increase the tracking force. Also, I don't have as much leeway weight-wise as before. This is because the arm is effectively lighter now that the junction box has been removed. If I were to buy a new RS A1 arm I would do it again because of the gain in transparancy.
Now I am thinking that if I were to remove the RCA junction at the base, and
proceed with one long lead directly to the pre, I would gain some more transparancy.
Dickson that Acrotec wire sounds interesting, it seems thin enough.
Thanks again guys, and I do recommend the removal of the junction box behind the cartridge leads.
Cheers,