Which ARC Linestage?

I've got a SP-6B with unbelievable phono stage. This will keep up with anything new.

The LS-10 is a killer linestage. It is the best solid state pre AR ever made, hands down. Sold for $5k new, can be had for about $2k today, but they only resurface a couple of times a year here on the 'Gon. Pitch black background that is downright spooky. I've owned it on three separate occasions. I kept going back to it....only the Ref3 kept me from buying it again. You don't hear much about it here on the 'Gon, but it is a real winner.

Anyone have the chance to compare the LS25 with the LS25MkII? It seems the MkII is using the same (2) 6H30 set up as the LS26, which would appear to be a step forward. How might either of these units compare with the new LS17?

I owned the ARC LS25, Ref 2 MKI and MKII and the LS26 as well as the Ref 3. Overall, the original LS25 with the 6922 tubes was the most natural sounding of them all. The LS25MKII was less involving as well upon demo vs the original. Many high end preamp designers have revisited the 6922 sound and have agreed it to be a more musical tube vs the 6H30...curse you Victor!!

I've used several models of ARC Linestages. Started with LS-1, then LS-3, then LS-2B Mk II. My current linestage is the LS-25 Mk I with GNSC Ref mod. I had the LS-2B Mk II for 8 years prior to the LS-25. The LS-2B is simply not in the same league as the LS-25. The LS-25 has more clarity, more extensions at both ends, and bigger and better defined soundstages.

We had compared mine against a friend's Ref 2 Mk II. It was a coin toss. The Ref 2 was better in certain areas, while the modded LS-25 excelled at other areas. The price of buying a used LS-25 and getting it modded by GNSC was about the same two years ago as buying a used Ref 2 Mk II. The benefit of the LS-25 was that I would be able to roll other NOS tubes to change/improve the sound. During the comparison, I was using a quad of Siemens Falcon 6922s that came with the mod. I personally like Amperex tubes better. I think if I had some Amperex tubes in there, the outcome would have been different, as some of the attributes that we had discussed during the comparison sounded more like characteristics of the Siemens tubes rather than the linestage itself.

FrankC