Tweaks such as demagnetizers ionizers for lp's


What are the options as in brands that demagnetize 12" lp's. The ones I have found seem to be expensive $2k and up.
What other tweaks are available ionizers included?
pedrillo
Doug, I am really surprised to read that your nephew thinks the effect may be to reduce or alter static charge.
Lew, I never said anything about static charge. Nor did I quote my nephew. Were you thinking of someone else?
Lewm, I think you are referring to MikeLevigne and his son-in-law not to Dougdeacon.
Sorry, Doug. You must be correct, Peter. Question now goes to Mike L. I am a biologist who was always fascinated by physics.
Doug,

yes; i did post that my son-in-law, when wroking on his Phd in Physics 5 years ago, worked with eliminating 'surface tension' on the test gear he was using to get the degree of precision of measurement he needed. he told me that static energy held micro dust particles to a glass surface that would reduce the accuracy of his test gear. he also told me that certain types of testing gear use a 'de-static' process automatically to do this. when i showed him what the Tourmaline guns and even the demagnatizers were doing he thought the most logical explanation was related to micro dust and static electricity, not magnatized media.

to me it also makes sense. removing minute dust should improve the laser reading, stylus groove interface, or whatever. and it seems like a much more plausable explanation than something magnetic.

i want to again mention that he was just guessing at the time. he said if someone would fund the research he could likely prove his guess in a lab.

my son-in-law got his Phd, did his post doc work, and is now a 'Scientist' building/inventing measurment devices for industry. i should ask him the same question again and see if he still thinks the same about it.
I purchased the hand held magnet that Dan recommended. I am very pleased with it. I have left it on for several hours and it did not even get warm to the touch. It looks like they fixed the problem that Doug warned us about.

Doug also said, "The idea is to start with the device (powered up) very close to the object. Circle it s-l-o-w-l-y around the object while s-l-o-w-l-y increasing the distance."

Doug, I am hopeful you could expand on this. Would "very close" mean 1/2"? Would "circle slowly" mean 1 revolution per second? Would "increasing the distance" mean 1" per second, the whole process taking 5 seconds?

I leave the record in its Mo-Fi sleeve so that when starting very close I will not accidentally scratch the record.

Great tweek. Thanks to everyone.