Our home system: How good it is?


My music sound philosophy/reference is the live music/event that unfortunately I can’t mimic on my system or in any other audio system that I heard. I always say that the very best we can achieve is to be nearer to the recording and even this target is a little “ elusive “ to get for say the least.

Through my audio life I heard a lot of different audio systems: I heard it on audio shows, on dealer rooms and on home people’s systems.

With out any doubt the best audio system performances that I already experienced were/are on home systems where I learn several subjects ( including the people music sound priorities ) and one-two of them are the in deep care in the SET UP of each link on the whole audio chain ( including room ). Some of high price systems that I heard it are not very good because its “ lesser “ care on the each link SET UP.

I want to share with all of you my latest experiences that I had 2-3 weeks ago when I visit some audio friends on USA.
I was exposed to 7 different home systems and I share with you my thoughts on only 4 of those home audio systems that I consider have nothing less but top/first rate performance and where I really enjoy the music.

First than all I want to say that all those audio friends were very gentle and with a very high sense on hospitality: thank you in deep to every one for that I really appreciate it in every way including your very value time that you take/give me.

The best subject during my visit to each one of those great people was to know/meet them: meet people with an in deep knowledge on music ( music lovers more than hardware lovers.), with in deep audio experiences, with in deep know how on their each priorities, with in deep care on whole room-system SET UP, with a great software, with an open mind to share and to accept different points of view, with in deep understanding that there are no perfect systems, with a “ humility “ attitude that it is a must to have to grow-up and with the enjoy “ feeling “ of music listening.

This was a very rare opportunity that I enjoy it and that I know I was so lucky about: Thank you again to all of you!!!!

In no order of preference here it is:

HOUSTON: Fred’s place with a dedicated audio room. Acapella big Triolon speakers, Einstein front end electronics, Rockport/Titan i analog rig, Nordost, JC-1s amps, etc.

When the first music note comes from this system you know that it is something special and after a few minutes you forgot about the hardware and start to enjoy fully the software ( either analog/digital ).
The system is so easy to transmit the music “ feelings/emotions “ and let that the sound/music flow directly to your mind.

Those Triorlon are really great and my hat off to Acapella people because they blend three different speaker drivers in an almost perfect mix. I don’t like ( but the immediacy ) horns ( I heard many of them ) and the Triorlon’s has two of them in the midrange frequency range and I have to say that these horns are the lower horn-signature that I ever heard, the mid bass/bass are moving coil drivers and the Plasma tweeter is ( probably ) the speaker star but with out saying “ I’m here “, like I say almost perfect driver blend.

BOISE: Steve’s place with a dedicated audio room. MBL 111 speakers, custom made Berning’s monoblock amplifiers, Technics SP10 MK3 with a Steve self design/build gorgeous plinth with Schroeder Reference tonearm and strain gauge cartridge/front end by Soundsmith and Lyra Olimpos.

This was my three time that I heard MBL speakers and my first time on a home system: what a difference!!!!, these system/speakers are so near the real music that, like in Fred’s system, the only think that you want is to hear music and more music: LP after LP and again!!!!

Those custom made amplifiers are very good match to the MBL’s and has the lower coloration of tube-signature amplifier I ever heard. I know that the MBL speakers are not easy/friendly with tube electronics and in this system everything is on target, of course that Steve’s hand on this count a lot for that.

I experienced here two different quality performance sound: the Soundsmith one ( that is good ) and a MC cartridge one. I have to say that the Soundsmith rig was only 20-30 hours from new and even Steve was “ playing “ with the set-up. Anyway IMHO that day the Lyra quality performance was way better and I enjoy it for many hours. With this MC cartridge things ( great things ) come out specially the non-sense audio system: disappear!, I had only the LP music performance: great performances.

DALLAS: Louis’s place with a dedicated audio room. Kharma Exquisite 1A speakers, CAT’s monobloks ( new ones: 30 hours on it. ), Lamm/Aesthetix front end electronics, Garrad 301/Triplanar/Xv-1and Technics SP-10MK3/SME/Air Tight both with a custom made wood plinths and the 301 with a custom made power supply.

First thing you note at Loui’s place is that huge room, the biggest I ever know ( maybe 2.3 times the Steve or Fred ones that are big. ) in a home stereo system.

Here I think that the stars are those 550 pound each speakers and its room good integration ( not an easy task ). Like the other systems this one is different but really good. This is my second time hearing Kharma speakers and I have to say that are very very good performers.

The whole sound is a refined/sophisticated one where you or anyone are asking for more, not more quality but more time to heard/hear and enjoy music. I was surprised by the 301 rig quality performance ( where I know very well the XV-1 quality. ): first rate, I can’t hear any coloration that I can/could say: “ that’s was the 301 “.

As good as I heard that system Louis told me that through his Lamm amplifiers ( SE 15-18 watts ) the quality of the system’s sound is a step higher!!, unfortunately I can’t hear it with these amplifiers. Anyway a pleasure to hear it on the Cats.

SAN DIEGO: Mark’s place with out a dedicated audio room ( the system belongs to the sitting room ). Revel speakers, Threshold amplifier, Hovland front end electronics and Raven/Triplanar/Ruby 2.

It seems the “ modest “ system on the group but a top quality performer where we know immediately the very hard work that Mark made to achieve that high quality performance. I know very well the Ruby 2 and in this system is something to hear.
Here there is no single “ star “ but a very good set up of audio items group that sounds a lot better that some very high price systems that I heard, money means nothing at all with out whole/overall knowledge.

As different as are all these audio system all them share common things: system whole synergy, when you heard it you know everything is there ( soundstage, good tonal balance, inner detail, transparent, fast response, dynamics, etc, etc, ), nothing is telling you “ I’m here “ ( very well balance ), sounds good with different kind of music and at different SPL levels, you can heard it for many hours and enjoy every minute, etc, etc.

Are these audio system “ perfect “ ?, certainly not: nothing is. Their owners ( all of them ) already know that they have “ land “ to improve and more important that this fact is that all them know where to improve.

Something to “ ask “ to these systems?, well as you know I’m for full range ( octave to octave ) audio systems and if I put really exigent then I can say that all these system “ miss “ the last bass octave/half octave. This bass octave is system/room dependent and speaker design specification dependent: non of those speakers were designed to achieve that low bass frequency range with the same high quality of the other frequency ranges.
Anyway I can say that I never feel the necessity of that bass octave during all those many hours of music pleasure hearing all those audio systems.

It is a nice thing to learn, through other home audio system listening experiences, if what we have at home is in the right “ road “ and this fact help all of us to grow up in the quest of home audio music sound reproduction heaven.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Ag insider logo xs@2xrauliruegas
Dear Stltrains: +++++ " Experimentation is a necessity. " +++++

I could add: any kind of continuous experimentation even those un-orthodox ones, we need an 100% open mind married with nothing but music quality reproduction.

+++++ " Another necessity is good comparisons. " +++++

I can add: good and bad comparisons, I always learn about it does not matters how high or low is the quality performance on an audio system, of course that there are a lot lot more to learn in a good system ( like the ones named here ) that in a not so good system.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Raul,

thanks....i got your meaning. and i believe that 'there' is a pathway of discovery and enjoyment.....not a stationary place. all the better when that journey is shared.

cheers,

mike
I might add from personal experience that the path does not always lead forward. In some instances it may lead backward and then be corrected. Likewise, each new piece of equipment is not always better or worse, sometimes it is merely different. It is probably also worth saying that the insertion of a better piece of equipment does not invariably lead to an improvement in sound due to synergies that sometimes form among existing components.
Dear Fred: +++++ " I might add from personal experience that the path does not always lead forward. In some instances it may lead backward and then be corrected. " +++

you are totally right.

++++ " Likewise, each new piece of equipment is not always better or worse, sometimes it is merely different. " +++++

I agree and we have many examples about specially with cartridges where several times one is not a better performer but only different.
IMHO it is always a challenge to us to discern when an audio item is different and when is really better.

+++++ " It is probably also worth saying that the insertion of a better piece of equipment does not invariably lead to an improvement in sound due to synergies " +++++

well Fred we are in the same " channel ": yes when I introduce a better audio item in my system I don't evaluate till I make a new set up, I never " wait/hope " that because the " new " audio device is better it must improve ( with out any change in the system ) the quality sound reproduction, sometimes that could happen but normally I have to make some " work " around.

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
Dear friends: All of us know that to obtain a " stellar " sound reproduction is not an easy task and that we have to take care on any single link in the audio chain trying to add ( distortions/noise/stages/colorations/etc ) the less in each link and loose the less in each link too taking care about each other link synergy, of course that it is more complex that these words.

Well, there is a link that maybe because is obvious almost no one speaks about and that it is very important and I'm reffereing to our seat position and chair, let me explain a little about on what I experienced on different home systems and my own too:

in my case I have a single ( one person ) chair/couch that it is confortable but not to much confortable, mi sitting position put my ears at almost tweeter level ( high ) and a little behind the triangle vertice between the speakers and the seat position, normally this is how I listen my system but when I need to evaluate in deep ( any thing ) I put my seat a little foreward ( of course that this is system dependent ) where everything is more precise.

Other that the seat position I experience that from my neck and up must be " free " : nothing surrounding it avoiding a high seat back. If your chair has a high seat back ( where you rest part of your head ) make a test: listen seating back on your chair and then listen sitting straight a little forward and you will understand what I'm talking about: in almost all my different home systems about the quality sound percived is a lot better when your neck/head are totally " free ".

Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.