Hi Blueranger.
I've used the 2.2 with the Uwe bodied DL103R. It worked fine. However, when I added a headshell weight (7.5g) to the DL /Graham I liked the sound better. I also got my above noted arm/cart res to happen near 10hz this way with the Graham.
The Graham 2.2 is an impressive arm, imho. And it also helps that it is capable of so much adjustment....even to its mass.
Yet it seems like a mismatch. The DL-103 is beneath it.
At the moment I'm using a Zeta tonearm with the Uwe bodied DL103-R on a TD124 and feel this to be a fairly good match-up. Dynamic, slammy and surprisingly detailed.
-Steve
I've used the 2.2 with the Uwe bodied DL103R. It worked fine. However, when I added a headshell weight (7.5g) to the DL /Graham I liked the sound better. I also got my above noted arm/cart res to happen near 10hz this way with the Graham.
The Graham 2.2 is an impressive arm, imho. And it also helps that it is capable of so much adjustment....even to its mass.
Yet it seems like a mismatch. The DL-103 is beneath it.
At the moment I'm using a Zeta tonearm with the Uwe bodied DL103-R on a TD124 and feel this to be a fairly good match-up. Dynamic, slammy and surprisingly detailed.
-Steve