Shane, I would love a photo. Would clear things up. I am more concerned w. overhang for the Ikeda than anything else. All other arms can use regular null points but the Ikeda geometry defys it. Let me explain to you my problem in more detail, If the arm effective length is 307mm (this is from stylus to pivot but not following a line through the arm as the arm isn't straight, instead it is based on probably the shortest distance between parralel lines that intersect both the stylus & pivot - it gets complicated), and the required spindle to pivot distance is 295 mm. But the stylus to tonearm collar (where the headshell meets the tonearm) is 50mm. If all is good all you need is 295mm pivot to spindle. With the SPU you have 52mm so I extended the Spindle to pivot distance to 297mm (adding 2 mm to compensate). This is due to Ikeda mentioning going past the 50mm is detrimental & better to be too short. Anyhow, so now, I did that & measured the overhang the best I could & I get close to 20mm right now. Truth be told there really is no way to measure overhang so really what am I doing. Anyhow, I am playing the SPU right now & it sounds magnificent. Better than before when I used the 66 null point. So go figure. But I want to be sure. I got my Colibri running in my Phantom & need to finish setting up the SQ again. Also, I need to finish setting up the Breuer which comes w. the worst manual I have ever received. One typed paper. Thanks to TW for a little coaching on this.