Dynavector DV 507 MKII

Hello Raul,

I ran a quick test this morning and my first impression is that the sound is more articulate and it has more dynamic contrast with the dial set to zero and using the sub weight to set the appropriate VTF. I also perceived a bit less bass weight, but I cannot be completely sure about it. It might be simply the effect of tighter bass.

From a more technical perspective, with the dial set to zero the sub weight needs to be closer to the pivot in order to achieve the desired VTF. This creates less moment (m=d*f) as the sub weight mass vertical movement is shorter, hence creating the opposite of a craw bar effect.

The less moment generated with the sub weight closer should produce even a faster vertical recovery when the short arm maneuvers a bump or a warp, which is one of the unique design features of this tonearm.

Thanks a lot for the tip. I never thought about it, but it makes sense now that I think about it. I discussed my notes with a engineer friend of mine and he says it makes sense as well.

Best,

iSanchez

all you guys that have experience with the DV 507. How good is it? Any down side? (except the price)?

Audiofeil, thinking about it again and I agree with you, even if your nick means "audiowrong" translated directly from Norwegian (sorry, just had to mention it. Forgive me).

We all know that the VTA is of great importance for the VTF, especially with dynamic force.
My writing might be based on the fact that I do not remember well enough. But, could it be that the combination of headshell and cartridge would influence on how precise the dial is if you have the VTA set different from the angle in witch you outbalanced the arm. I have some problem explaining this in English and I don’t think it is it of great value anyway.

The dial is in my opinion consequent, but the numbers on it is meant for reference not correct value.

Sorry I couldn't explain this any clearer.