Dertonarm,
i saw your response to my post over on the 'Absolute' best cartridge' thread regarding my reel to reel comments. i had asked....
you responded....
your answer did not really speak to my question....have you heard newer transports with improved output electronics (such as the Cello circuit)?
i thought that making that point on that thread was not the right thing to do (as you noted) but maybe here on this thread you could more specifically answer my question.
my opinion is that the very best transports combined with improved output electronics can be every bit as good and likely better than the most 'loved' and 'revered' 60's RTR decks. they would have more dimentionality and low level dynamics.
i saw your response to my post over on the 'Absolute' best cartridge' thread regarding my reel to reel comments. i had asked....
have you investigated newer RTR transports with improved ss output electronics?
you responded....
I am pretty accustomed to the younger generation Studers too.
The improvement in speed stability and reduced vibration does not really make up for loss of dimensionality and low level dynamics compared to the C-37 - especially not when running at 15ips.
your answer did not really speak to my question....have you heard newer transports with improved output electronics (such as the Cello circuit)?
i thought that making that point on that thread was not the right thing to do (as you noted) but maybe here on this thread you could more specifically answer my question.
my opinion is that the very best transports combined with improved output electronics can be every bit as good and likely better than the most 'loved' and 'revered' 60's RTR decks. they would have more dimentionality and low level dynamics.