I agree with Topo and Axel's mix. I even go a little stronger, but it leaves things a little "squeaky". (Is bright clean? I don't know) I also use Audio Intelligent, which, being enzyme based, makes me think it's a little cleaner, as it's getting to release agents and other possible organic stuff like fungus. AI is clearly smoother sounding. No, I don't have my system in a room where fungus is growing...
One of these cleaners is more correct. I don't know which. They definitely sound different. I do know which one costs more: ) Photoflo actually put a warning on its bottle years ago not to use it as a surfactant for anything but photos. I've used it for years and have a pretty nice front end: things still sound great on my analogue stuff. I think I would know from years of use if I were doing any harm to my albums.
Hell, I even use Torumat, which has some sort of lubricant in it. George of Stanalog and AJVDH give a wink and a nod to Torumat. It wins the static contest over my other two cleaners: far fewer static issues and records stay clean while they play, instead of attracting dust with every rotation.
Nobody that I'm aware of has done a significant study on the use of alcohol based cleaners: we know they strip vinyl stabilizers, but no one has agreed at what % and at what rate and therefore, how much is too much.
Labratory grade alcohol? No, I use Everclear 20%, 80% triple distilled ionized water and 2 drops photoflow per 8 ounces. If I'm not using near 100% alcohol, then I want to know what adulterants it has in it. Everclear is pretty free of extra "stuff".
With any alcohol, I have never gone stronger than 1/5 by volume, esp. if I were driving;)