Who asked for this?


I personally think the new 2-album 45 rpm craze is a PITA and that the record companies could have brought out a product that was 98% as good on one 33.3 rpm disc. Who wants to clean and store and extra disc with every record? Well, the vinyl industry must have heard my plea and is now releasing an even bigger abomination: FOUR single-sided 45 rpm discs per record. I'm sure you can't wait to get your hands on this stuff so you can spend even more time screwing around with the records and less time listening. (nothing personal - just a rant)

http://store.acousticsounds.com/d/61219/Dave_Brubeck_Quartet-Time_Out-45_RPM_Vinyl_LP
chayro
I know you're just ranting, but have you "heard" these new releases? I have (4) of the new Classic 45 RPM Box Sets on the new Clarity vinyl formula and they are terrific. YES, they are a pain in butt to have to clean more records and change the album side every few minutes, but boy, do they sound good. I say it's worth the hassle, but that's just my opinion...
No, I haven't heard them and I doubt I will. I have several of the new 45 rpm reissues and some are very good. However, I have numerous 33.3s that I think are equal in quality without the extra fussing. Even assuming that someone thinks 45s are better, is it really necessary to go to 4 single-sided discs?
MoFi - they may well sound excellent, but do you really think it's because they used 4 single-sided discs as opposed to using 2 double-sided? Or one 33.3 disc made with equal care and expense?
I have to agree with you to a degree. I have a lot of two album 45rpm and a few of the Clarity Vinyl sets. They do sound nice. But, my best sounding LP's happen to be very well done 33 1/3. I would like to see higher quality 33 1/3. I don't mind changing the record on the 45's but am getting tired of having so many vinyl disks. I love my vinyl and if I only had one source it would be vinyl, but I think we are going to suffer from the retro bandwagon trends for awhile due to it's new found popularity.