9", 10" or 12" tonearms


I keep seeing tonearm ads listed by length and would like someone to comment on the sonic differences that length can make. I know that longer arms cost more so I assume that there must be some difference sonically. Can someone please explain?
russellrcncom
The longer tonearm results in less derivation from the tangential zero tracking error line. Sonically it gives a wider soundstage with more stable individual positioning. Furthermore you can expect to hear less distortion in climax' and critical high frequency passages. All these are direct results of a more " stable aligned" position of the polished area of the stylus seen in the horizontal plane.
All the above are only a relative advantage between tonearms of the same design (VPI, DaVinci, SME, FR etc.) but available in different total length.
Its similar to sailing boats - length gives smoother run.....
If possible ( many TTs do not offer an option to mount tonearms with a total length in excess of 10") I would always go for a 12" tonearm. The geometrical advantages do in general (with good designs..) more than make up for increased effective moving mass and (sometimes...) small decrease in stiffness.
If you look around you will notice that its always the 12" versions of vintage tonearms (SAEC, FR, SME, Ortofon, DaVinci etc.) which do command the high prices on the second hand market. They were more expensive then their shorter brothers too when new, but they tend to preserve their value much more stable and often do increase over time ( due to their rarity too).
The "kings" of pivot tonearm designs are all 12" versions.
>>The "kings" of pivot tonearm designs are all 12" versions.
Dertonarm<<

That's hardly true.

Design, build quality, and implementation are far more important.

With more experience, you'll get it.
Of course you are right Audiofeil, tonearms like the SME 3012 (any version), FR-66s, FR-66fx, Ikeda IT-407, Ortofon 309, EMT, DaVinci 12, SAEC 506, SAEC 8000, AC-4400, Schroeder 11.5" are all 12" (or slightly more... or less) but do range rather low, both in their manufacturers order of importance/quality/design/build quality/implementation or price-list.
Thus reflecting through price policy their level of quality and performance.
That too is the reason why they go so cheap in the used market and why there is no demand for them either.
Thank you for setting this straight.
With another 29 years experience in high-end audio I will certainly getting it.
No problem Gerhard or Wilhelm or Adolph or Gustav or whatever name you hide behind.

But 29 years might not be enough based on your posts.

Good luck.

Bill Feil
Well, when someone out there owns a Fr-66s and want to switch to a Graham Phantom II, send me a mail.
Cash is waiting.