sme 30/2 or TW Acustic Raven AC3

Lewm

Yes, it was a dilemma that took a while to resolve. I use active crossover and pass the signal below 80 Hz to a separate pair of subwoofers with SS amplifiers mediated by a tube rectified preamp. The ribbons themselves are motivated by four channels of 50 watt Wavac SET amplifiers MD 572. The small foil supertweeter array is very efficient and is over powered with a 7 watt single ended el 84 amplifier. With the efficiency savings from the active crossover, i estimate the effect is about equivalent to 200 watt per channel SET driving the ribbons. SET's do not have problems with moderately low impednce, they are much more stressed by COMPLEX impedances, they see ribbons as static resistors.

It is unfair, to characterize the SME 30 as uninvolving but I am talking from my experiences. These are opinions, and yours may be different from mine but neither should be taken as gospel. It is just a hobby after all.

Pcosta,

It's always a good thing to hear from people who have had both components in their systems under similar circumstances. As I recall, however, when you sold your SME 30, it was with regret. You implied that you regarded the TW Acustic as sort of an "acceptable downgrade" or at best a side grade that allowed you to free up funds that were tied up in the SME 30 and purchase better electronics.
Your recollections of the SME 30 seem to be increasingly jaundiced with time, what's next, "dull and lifeless"?
Maybe you should at least get an SME 30 into your system again with your upgrades rather than recollect the SME 30 from memory in your previous less upgraded system.
That is why I regard the comments as being unfair. At least draw your comparisons again on equal standing on the same turf.
I have also upgraded my electronics with the SME 30 and have found it to more than keep up, it is a deep and stable vinyl platform.

Cjfrdw

Perhaps you should reread my old posts. I have zero regrets on selling my old SME 30. The only item I ever regret selling would be an Expressive Technologies SU-1. I have had my share of thing through here.

If I had the money to afford both tables I would have them. But "I" would most likely use the TW a lot more. BTW univolving and lifeless are essentially the same words to describe something. I never said the SME could not keep up. It will but to my ears it does not present it like the TW which I prefer more. That is esentially what you will always get when we all heve a difference of opinion. I can state my opinion because I have had both for at least three years.