I have owned the 110 and 160 and sold them on ebay after enjoying each for 120 hrs or slightly more. The 110 always struck me as slightly SUPERIOR to the 160, which should have been the other way around based on price. They were impressive, and I couldn't see keeping my Benz Micro ACE which cost hundreds more yet did not sound 4 or 5x better! I own the Maestro now, and also the Virtuoso. There is a true difference between the Maestro and the Denons, and I place the favor strongly with the Maestro. If I had never heard it, I would think I had achieved truly superb playback with the Denons. But the Maestro takes everything to a new level. Is it worth almost 10 times the price of a discounted Denon? I think so! As I said in a previous post, the Clearaudio Virtuoso, which is priced close to the Maestro, is audibly (I mean INSTANTLY) inferior to the Maestro, although it is a VERY FINE cartridge indeed. I won't be able to put everything I hear into words, but the best I can say is that you don't feel that ANY aspect of the listening experience is missing with the Maestro: soundstage is full and distinct; frequency balances are smooth and extended top to bottom, rather PLUSH and RICH, with a sense of air and space that makes listening to LPs so rewarding; very musical and non-fatiguing/non-harsh or bright. And every detail is there and it is a pleasure to listen to this cart. Makes me want to re-record all the LPs I transferred using the Denons, using the Maestro instead! The Virtuoso does about everything right but lacks the rich plushness that is so appealing when wed to detail, sound staging, dynamics, and frequency extension. That Maestro is awesome. If you send me your mailing address, I can send you a CDR made with the Maestro, vs. the Virtuoso: my pleasure.
Denon DL 106 vs Clearaudio Maestro Wood
I am interested in hearing from Audiophile/Musicphiles who have experienced both the Denon DL 106 and the Clearaudio Maestro Wood cartridges in their systems for at least 4 months. I would apprieciate responses from those that have high end equipment and not buget gear.
I am not interested in bang for the buck analysis, only in performance comparisons.
Thanks
I am not interested in bang for the buck analysis, only in performance comparisons.
Thanks
- ...
- 7 posts total
- 7 posts total