A Copernican View of the Turntable System

Dear Henry, We agree on something! That's exactly what I was trying to imply to Dgob without being annoying.

Halcro,

I have experimented with weights on the arm columns and with vtf variations. So far, not adequate. However, the fun continues...

Atmasphere, do take my suggestion seriously.

Lewm,

I don't think there was anything annoying about your opinion. Honestly! The key issue here is one of decoupling and if you review this thread you should see why the experimentation.

Hi Henry- you stated and I agree with this concept based on what I am hearing so far.
"I believe both turntable and arm pods should be 'coupled' in the same way ie all spikes.
I don't believe you should have spikes on the arm pods and pliable footers on the turntable OR vice versa."

Both my sp10 and ET armboard are on spikes. However.

I am also thinking if you are able to isolate the Platter/motor and armboard "properly" then this should not matter "as much" ?
If someones specific combination works in their system/kit it should be evident in what you hear - which is what matters not the concept.

This project has provided me with very neutral,distortion free sound - meaning to me no pronounced highs or lows, followed by what I have found to be a very strong desire to... and be able to - turn up the db as Dgob stated in an earlier post and enjoy the music immensely. Isn't this last sentence the PROOF "for me anyway" if certain projects are heading oneself closer toward "shangri la" in this hobby ?

My listening since implementation has been at a higher db. I'd like to go higher still but my family doesnt allow it. I need to spend more $$ first isolating my sound rooom better :).

Curiosity killed the cat - I put a wanted ad out for those AT616's and someone from Denmark replied and well I now have a set coming to me to try out this theory different feet on TT and armpod/board. I want to hear how it changes things up. Will let u know.

Hi Dgob

How heavy is the Acoustic Signature arm board that you are using and I am curious what type of center clamp you are using on your sp10 ?

My ET 2.5 armboard weighs more than the sp10 itself.

The next one will be made of brass and I will ensure it weighs more still. I feel the weight on the spikes is critical for isolation.

Dear Thuchan - thank you very much for your cartridge recommendations for my ET 2.5 arm.

Cheers Chris

At low volume levels its not that hard to get a 'table to sound good. Its at high volumes where the rubber hits the road. IMO, the turntable should be unassailable at any volume. I found that once I had sufficient mass and rigidity in the plinth, that that helped, but I also have the 'table perched on an Ultra Resolution Technologies platform, which is one of the best passive platforms I have seen, unfortunately no longer available (and stupidly expensive when they were!).

The platform is in turn set up on a Sound Anchors stand that is custom-built to accommodate the platform. In turn the stand is mounted on 3 Aurios-Pro bearings.

My point is that it is hard to really know what is the plinth in all this. The only decoupling that occurs is the platform itself and then between the platform and the stand, that is my 'suspension' so to speak. The platform is quite heavy, rigid and inert as it is a sandwich of a special grade of marble, high tensile steel and a military-grade constrained damping layer.

Vibration and resonance can be quite insidious in a turntable, so with respect to the anti-vibration platform, the platter and now (in the case of this thread) the arm tower, it is likely that it would be really difficult to go overboard on the whole thing.

Points in use under the platter and arm tower, while being mechanical diodes so to speak, are not actually perfect diodes. Like elastomerics, they are more efficient if they are loaded properly! So if the load on them is underpar, they simply will not work so well. Load up that arm tower! Get some mass on it, so the points can do their job.