Phono Pre-amp with XLR

Wolf_garcia, surprisingly (to me anyway), no, 'we' collectively don't seem to know that, even though that is the fact of the matter.

I say this because when we introduced the MP-1 22 years ago, it was the first balanced line preamp made. The fact that it is balanced line and not single-ended has been its biggest marketing problem: audiophiles and dealers alike have had problems with the idea that balanced lines are inherently superior in every way. One of the biggest superiorities, IMO, is the simple fact that if you do the balanced line properly, the cable no longer has to be expensive (that is why you will find me recommending Mogami Neglex cables in other threads).

We (rather innocently and also rather naively) assumed that audiophiles would be very interested in a technology that offered immunity to cables such that a $0.10/foot cable could sound as good as one that is $1000.00/foot. Boy were we wrong. Many audiophiles buy expensive cables for reasons that have nothing to do with audio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veblen_effect

I guess with some things (many amp designers), single ended equals "less is more" in the sense that no transformers are needed to deal with low impedance/balanced conversion, and that's fine for short run cables I suppose...I found through many years as an electric guitar player how much you lose with long, unbalanced cables, especially when you add up the distance the signal travels through a pedal board heap. I deal with that by putting a small "micro amp" at the end of the chain to "unload" the signal to the guitar amp...even the genius Les Paul tried to promote "low z" technology for guitars and it just never went anywhere. An attractive feature of my Dacmagic are the balanced outs, as are the balanced ins/outs of my Kavent preamp and old, trusty, Forte' power amp. I realize that sticking a pair of XLRs on the back of a turntable would be heresy to some, but really...come on designers! You could put the table 47 feet away from the preamp...

Prochk3, I looked at the phono pre ad and saw it claimed the unit was fully balanced input to output. But it has RCA instead of xlr inputs.

If the RCA is grounded as it usually is, the noninverting or plus signal is still going to the noninverting input of the balanced differential phono amps circutry. Its called a dif amp because it ampliflies the difference between the noninverting and the inverting inpts. So even if the inverting input is grounded you still get a signal at the output because of how the diff amp works. Thus you have a the xlr for the output of the balanced phono pre.

Now the outside of the RCA input jacks may be floating, not grounded, and thus the inverting signal from the cart still makes it to the iverting input of the bal diff amp.

That is not the ideal way to handle a balanced signal but the positive/negative signal from the cartdrige does make it to noninverting/inverting input of the bal diff amp.

I do not know if there is a significant difference sonically.

Atmasphere, what is your take?

Phono preamps can be misleading because some are single ended but add an extra balanced circut at the end. That is undesireable if you want to keep gain stages to a minmum.

TD

Atmasphere, with a true balanced phono pre amp, does it make a significant sonic difference if the pre amp is designed with RCA inputs where the inverting signal from the cartdrige is grounded at the RCA jack leaving only the noninverting signal going into the balanced diff amp?

Thanks, TD

RCA jacks can be used as an input to a balanced preamp. How it works is that the RCA jack is isolated from the chassis ground, so that the 'ground' connection of the RCA can function as the inverting input to the balanced preamp.

There are some problems with this approach- you still have to use a ground post, perhaps no problem if the ground connection is supplied. However, the interconnect between the tonearm and the preamp **must not use the minus (-) output of the cartridge as a shield for the plus (+) side!** This would result in hum.

Now assuming that such a cable issue is dealt with, you still have the problem of the fact that at the RCA connection itself, the 'minus' (inverting) connection is shielding the 'plus' (non-inverting) connection. This damages the overall Common Mode Rejection Ratio of the system; IOW, it makes it susceptible to hum.

You can set up the RCA so only one of the inputs of the preamp is driven and the other side is at ground, but again the CMRR of the preamp is not available to the user, although you don't have some of the hum susceptibility of the scenario in the prior paragraph.

So, on a very practical basis, the XLR is a superior connector. Any use of the RCA for a balanced connection is a sort of kludge approach.