Vintage DD turntables. Are we living dangerously?


I have just acquired a 32 year old JVC/Victor TT-101 DD turntable after having its lesser brother, the TT-81 for the last year.
TT-101
This is one of the great DD designs made at a time when the giant Japanese electronics companies like Technics, Denon, JVC/Victor and Pioneer could pour millions of dollars into 'flagship' models to 'enhance' their lower range models which often sold in the millions.
Because of their complexity however.......if they malfunction.....parts are 'unobtanium'....and they often cannot be repaired.
128x128halcro
Last month Lew brought up an aspect of performance that we read little about, speed correction timing.

"It's also the case that the L07D servo was deliberately designed to exert a much looser control on the speed than does the Technics servo, for one example. I think it only activates when there is +/-3% speed error."

Maybe it's my imagination, but I've heard this difference between my Kenny and other direct drives. Any thoughts on the timing of speed error control?
Can properly functioning non quartz servo controls outperform some quartz locked counterparts?
Regards,
Fleib.
To add a little more to your question. I took a lot of notes when upgrading a customers LO7D. One surprising observation is that the motor stator is rubber mounted via grommets. Such that it is possible for the stator to twist a little backwards in an anticlockwise direction when applying torque. This would seem to be counterintuitive but it is there in the design.

I don't know about the 3% servo thing, but it has been quoted many times in various posts. If this is how it is built, it would be a reasonable assumption that it is effectively open loop once up to speed. In this way it is relying on the synchronous motor's innate speed accuracy and the platters inertia to maintain the correct RPM.
07-13-15: Richardkrebs
Fleib.
To add a little more to your question. I took a lot of notes when upgrading a customers LO7D. One surprising observation is that the motor stator is rubber mounted via grommets. Such that it is possible for the stator to twist a little backwards in an anticlockwise direction when applying torque. This would seem to be counterintuitive but it is there in the design.

I don't know about the 3% servo thing, but it has been quoted many times in various posts. If this is how it is built, it would be a reasonable assumption that it is effectively open loop once up to speed. In this way it is relying on the synchronous motor's innate speed accuracy and the platters inertia to maintain the correct RPM.
Richardkrebs,
It is staggering that you would be performing turntable modifications without a thorough understanding how the TT works. It is fanciful to speculate that the Kenwood engineers designed "slippage" when torque is applied by using rubber grommets. It is more likely that they employed the grommets to reduce mechanical and/or electric noise within the suspended board and coils.

To help you understand the L07D servo operation, here is a link to the owners manual - http://www.vinylengine.com/library/kenwood/l-07d.shtml

Page 4 gives you an overview - the L07D uses a dual mode speed control system - if the speed error is below 3% the phase is controlled with a wide lock range and large phase gain. If the speed error exceeds 3% the servo controls speed rather than phase, and applies higher torque. When the servo mode switches from phase to speed control, the coupling changes from DC to AC to minimise influences from the motor drive circuit and motor offset.

Clearly the L07D relies more on platter inertia and phase locking for coping with stylus drag unless the speed error is very high. This is quite a different design to the Technics SP10 solution which relies on a much more aggressive servo speed control system with the DJ market in mind – the ability to start and stop on a dime was more important to the Technics engineers than the Kenwood engineers. I have listened to many L07D’s and SP10mk3’s at length and in my view the difference in servo design and implementation forms a significant difference in presentation, particularly in timing and coherency.
Dover, I've got a fully refurbished L07D sitting right next to a Krebs-modified SP10 Mk3 which I bought NOS (before replacing all electrolytics and having Bill Thalmann perform the Krebs mod). These are easily the two best turntables I have ever heard in my system, yet they sound very subtly different. Before the Krebs mod was performed on the Mk3, I would say the difference between the two was greater than it is now, in favor of the L07D. But of course, there are more differences between the two than those having to do with the drive system: The tonearms, tonearm wire, and phono cartridges are all different as well. They both feed into the same Atma-sphere MP1 phono stage. But it's fair to say that prior to the Krebs mods, I tended to favor the L07D (with an EMI/RFI shield installed between motor and underside of platter). The Krebs mod keeps the virtues and advantages of the Mk3, absolute firm sense of pace, while ameliorating the rather "clinical" nature of its sound, as compared to the L07D, which might in fact err on the side of romantic but intensely "musical". (I distrust that word, too.) These days, I could live with either, happily, but might now give the edge to Mk3. The Krebs mod is transformative.

Richard, I had reason recently to disassemble my L07D motor and then put it back together as well. I do not recall seeing any rubber grommets. What I did see were some nylon grommets and some brass grommets, neither of which afford much elasticity. Is it possible that the motor you looked into had been "messed with" by someone, some time in its past? If you look at the service manual, and if you consult Howard Stearn, the L07D guru who lives in Virginia, you would get confirmation that the grommets should be nylon or brass. Howard talked me through the rebuild process. My memory may be playing tricks on me re the rubber grommets, but I believe this is the case.

Fleib, For all I know, Pierre Lurne' is a genius when it comes to platter design, but I am no fan of any of the turntables with which he was associated. The ones I've heard (Audiomeca, Goldumund Studio, etc) all "suffer" I think both from speed irregularity and an overly spring-y suspension. They are kind of a yin to the yang of direct-drive turntables.
Dover,

"with the DJ market in mind". I trust you were referring to radio station DJs, which were a market for early Technics DD tables, not dance club scratch/mobil DJs. I've read many false assertions the Technics SL-1200s were designed for dance club DJs. I believe the SP-10 and SL-1200 series were designed in the '70s, a time before dance club DJs evolved.

I don't mean to sound picky here but I hate to see the DJ misrepresentation continued for any newbie readers here who may not be familiar with DD design and development.