Turntable speed accuracy

Thuchan, I reluctantly admit to being a "neutrality apostle". But I am reluctant only because, IMO, the term neutrality is usually misunderstood. In your comment you pair the term neutrality with sonic-footprint. From my vantage point, sonic footprint is, by definition, usually the result of distortions. Neutrality (or however close a component gets to it) is a measure of musicality. In other words, a component that is truly musical IS closer to neutral. "Precision control" allows musicality.

Regards.

well said Frogman, but I am not pairing sonic footprint and neutrality. Sonic Footprint in my understanding is that you recognise the turntable's abiliy in producing fine music. Just take the EMT R80 (927) as an example. Agree completly that Precision Control allows musicality. I for myself need both!

Some people argue that a turntable should just reproduce which is a funny statement. A Linn Lp 12 and some of the smaller new Thorens tables e.g. also reproduce - but with what kind of result. Of course some people may like it. good. Distortion is a wide field and I know someone in this community who loves the term.

In my understanding sonic footprint is not the result of distortions at all. The Nakamichi, or the EMT as well as the Micros do have a sonic footprint which is different. Does this mean I am surrounded by distortions, God beware. I would jump from the bridge...

best @ fun only

Dear Thuchan, Please do not jump, but isn't the answer to your question obvious? If the 3 tt's sound different, then they are introducing different "colorations". Or possibly one is "neutral" and the other two are introducing colorations. No matter how you say it, these colorations amount to distortion in one form or another. I would also say that it does not matter, as long as any of them can make you feel you are at a live event, or even if they make you feel alive. How about the Continuum, which you don't mention?

Halcro, as I posted on 11/16 the SP-10 Mk2 manual states that table will maintain correct speed if up to 500 arms could be lowered simultaneously while tracking at 2 g. Even with an error range of 10%, it should be correct with up to 450 arms! From that, your three arm test was not much of a challenge. ;-)

However I suppose the problem with the Technics statement is the table could "maintain correct speed" with up to 1K gram weight applied. That could be different from not maintaining speed at the moment the weight was applied. In other words, should one allow say one revolution to correct the speed with this weight? That would be a big difference in sonic terms.

So if I'm understanding this, your laser mark should be measured precisely at the moment each stylus is lowered onto the record with no time interval to allow your table to correct for the added drag.

I found an article online about the Nak. Very interesting tt. The author had an excerpt from an interview with the designer. He substantiates my point exactly. He says vinyl record runout is the elephant in the room that tt designers ignore. As for inertia: Torque= J*omega, which is the angular term for F=ma. The tt motor provides the torque and the platter bearing and stylus apply a counter torque. The inertia of the platter determines the rate of change in speed (deceleration). Say for example the motor is uncoupled from the platter. The platter is spinning at 33.33 rpm. (ignore bearing friction for a moment) Now drop the stylus onto the record. A 20 kg platter is going to decelerate at a lower rate, for example, than a 2 kg platter.
Now let's hook the motor back up to our platter. The motor is either clocked to the 60Hz line frequency or is feedback servo controlled. So it holds the platter at 33.33 rpm. Any perturbation in the platter speed causes the torque output of the motor to change in order to restore 33.33 rpm. The motor could do it's job regardless of the amount of inertia in the platter. The stability of the platter speed is based on the control loop and torque of the motor combined with the system inertia. That means the designer has to couple a motor and platter as a system. The platter is designed to be a mass damper. We use mass dampers in dynamic systems. We use mass to tune System Natural Frequencies and keep them out of certain operating ranges. A bigger platter requires a higher torque motor in order to be stable. Perhaps the youtube example is a tt design with an undersized motor. I would say as a rule of thumb, the motor in a tt should be able to accelerate the platter up to speed within one rotation. To me that would indicate that the motor has sufficient torque to maintain a stable speed. btw- I just checked my tt and it is up to speed within one rotation.