Turntable speed accuracy


There is another thread (about the NVS table) which has a subordinate discussion about turntable speed accuracy and different methods of checking. Some suggest using the Timeline laser, others use a strobe disk.

I assume everyone agrees that speed accuracy is of utmost importance. What is the best way to verify results? What is the most speed-accurate drive method? And is speed accuracy really the most important consideration for proper turntable design or are there some compromises with certain drive types that make others still viable?
peterayer
Albert
I'm guessing either the laser mark with the platter having slowed would take longer to traverse a section of wall (unlikely to have slowed enough to make a visible difference IMHO) or perhaps a high frequency flutter is causing the mark to appear longer.... very interesting anyway.

Dover
I should add that I have so far only used belt drive and a Garrad idler(which to me sounds less speed stable than my belt drive...something wrong with it???).
I'm starting to buy the argument for dd though so I may well travel down that path soon.
Halcro - welcome back. Australian politics has been very entertaining of late. Are you putting your hat in for Foreign Minister
Ha ha.....thanks Dover.
I don't think the Foreign Minister NOR Prime Minister will somehow pass the Timeline test??!
Really looking forward to your tests with the Timeline?
Hi Albert,
I have seen exactly that phenomenon with the Timeline on the Raven AC-2 driven by a slipping thread.
I know exactly what is happening and it is borne out by the laser mark AND the sound at the very same time.
The Timeline is its own reward :^)
I sent the amateurish YouTube video of my TT-101 with the Timeline to Ron Sutherland who was so impressed....he said he was going to include a link on his new web site.
Ahhh....fame at last :^)
Halcro,

I assumed the same thing you did and heard the result as reduced dynamics and slurring. Funny you detected the same phenomenon.

I agree, Ron has a winner, http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue58/awards2011.htm

Scroll almost to the bottom.

I gave Ron Product of The Year for the Timeline. I'm pretty sure I stirred up some of this when I began posting results of my own tests last year.

The Timeline may not be a "perfect" product but it sure reveals errors that a printed disc and strobe miss. I would go so far as to suggest the Timeline supports things we hear and previously could not prove.