Richardkrebs
Can you please review the video again.
From 0-24 seconds you can read the 33 quite clearly, but the 33 is moving forward and back, it is not stable.
From about 57 seconds on - he now has a constant load on the platter. 33 is unreadable, but it looks to me as though the surging has ceased.
The conclusions I see from the video are :
Unloaded, it is sort of speed stable but "hunting". Can you not see this ?
Loaded - appears to me to suggest this deck is not accurate with a load ( blurred 33 ) but ironically the long term speed variation seems to have improved with the finger load on it ( less drift ).
To be fair to the deck, the load on it probably takes the deck outside of its error correction operating parameters.
Can you please review the video again.
From 0-24 seconds you can read the 33 quite clearly, but the 33 is moving forward and back, it is not stable.
From about 57 seconds on - he now has a constant load on the platter. 33 is unreadable, but it looks to me as though the surging has ceased.
The conclusions I see from the video are :
Unloaded, it is sort of speed stable but "hunting". Can you not see this ?
Loaded - appears to me to suggest this deck is not accurate with a load ( blurred 33 ) but ironically the long term speed variation seems to have improved with the finger load on it ( less drift ).
To be fair to the deck, the load on it probably takes the deck outside of its error correction operating parameters.