MC Phono preamp gains


If an MC phono preamp supports 45dB to 70dB, then would it work just like MM phono preamp if its gain is set at 45dB?
If that's the case, those phono preamps which support both MM and MC can essentially work as two MM inputs, right?

I am looking for a phono preamp that supports two MM inputs. I already have an SUT for my MC cartridges, so an MC input is not needed, but there exits very few phono preamps which support two MM inputs. So, I wonder if I can use those phono preamps that support both MM and MC as two MM input phono by setting the MC gain to the lowest (45dB).
128x128ihcho
Ihcho, if you're looking for MM premps (and you need 3 of them or one with 3 imput) why no try 3 different things with your cartridges and keep the best. So many MM preamps available, if you will search audiogon for preamp thread you will see at least 5 decent options to buy and they are not expensive.
Chakster,
I ended up having two turntables. One turntable has two arms. I use one arm for mono, and the the two for stereos. Some of my LPs are not in pristine condition, but I still listen to them. So I use more expensive cartridges (Ortofon SPUs) for mint LPs and use less expensive cartridges (Denon, Audio Technica, ...) for non-mint LPs.
I currently have two phono stages for three arms, so I need to change cables from time to time.
I am thinking of selling them and buying one that has two/three inputs. Or, I can keep the other two and buy a decent phono that supports one input.
I didn't know about Rhea, and it appears to work well with my setup. The only problem is, I don't have enough budge for it, and I need to sell the other two afford it.
You can use one tonearm for VG vinyl, next one for VG+ and third for Mint- to be correct with your grading (just kidding).
Almarg, Re your comments on the Rhea. I own a Janus, recently inherited from the estate of a friend. I was poking around in it, and it seems that the output from its phono section is a 6992 used as a plate-follower, rather than as a cathode follower, as one might otherwise have expected. This topology would indeed give it a rather high-ish output impedance, but in the Janus, the phono section only has to drive the built-in line stage. Does the Rhea output stage also consist of a plate-follower? Thanks.
Lew, sorry to hear of the loss of your friend.

My relevant knowledge of the Aesthetix products is limited to what can be inferred from JA's measurements and from info at the Aesthetix site. Both the Rhea and the Janus are specified as having output impedances of 1K single-ended and 600 ohms balanced. The recommended minimum load for the Janus is specified as 10K single-ended and 20K balanced. A load recommendation of 10K min is specified for the Rhea, with no indication of which output it pertains to. In view of JA's measurements of the Rhea, I suspect that all of those minimum load recommendations are aggressive rather than conservative.

What is particularly noteworthy is that it can be inferred from JA's measurements that different topologies are likely to be used for the Rhea's single-ended and balanced outputs, and given the similarity between the specifications of the Rhea and the Janus I suspect that the same holds true for the Janus.

For the Rhea's balanced outputs JA measured 110 and 156 ohms at 1 kHz and 20 kHz respectively, which is suggestive of a cathode follower, and 3846 ohms at 20 Hz, which is suggestive of a somewhat low value coupling capacitor connected between the cathode follower and the output.

For the Rhea's single-ended outputs he measured 2K throughout most of the audio band, and 3.05K at 20 Hz. That would seem to be suggestive of the output signal being derived from a plate circuit, again with a somewhat low value coupling capacitor in series.

As I say, the similarity of the specifications suggests that the main outputs of the Janus are probably similar in those respects. In which case the concern I mentioned earlier about cable capacitance, with respect to the Rhea's single-ended outputs (but not with respect to its balanced outputs, since the balanced output impedance is low at high frequencies, where cable capacitance may come into play), seems likely to be applicable to the Janus as well. And the concern about the minimum input impedance of the component that is being driven, with JA's measurements suggesting more stringent guidelines than are recommended in the specs, seems likely to be applicable to both outputs of both components.

Best regards,
-- Al