Well I am trying out the AU79 and the MIT IC's along with the Acoustic Zen cables this week. Have no clue what I am doing ... tips on what features to listen for would be helpful!
I am upgrading from Audioquest Opal (single ended). All of the demo cables are better! The demo's are balanced) and are used betwen the DAC and pre amp.
Levinson transport Sonic Frontiers Mark 2 to Audio Research LS15 to Classe 2200 Power amp and Kef 104/2 speakers.
My initial impression is that the AU74 is warmer then the MIT's... Easy to live with. My description would match the web site.
I wrote down... the MIT's seem to have a bit more base extension and are clear.. also very easy to live with the MIT's.
Getting the impedance match was critical... they were awful at Medium impedance... Very nice at High impedance.... (This matches the Pre Amp spec as well)
The MIT's seem to be a bit more effecient then the Snynergistcs. eg... a click or two on the pre amp to match volumes.. (wild ass guess on the level mathces here)
This got me wondering if the impedance matching of the synergistics is not quite right for my gear?
I am upgrading from Audioquest Opal (single ended). All of the demo cables are better! The demo's are balanced) and are used betwen the DAC and pre amp.
Levinson transport Sonic Frontiers Mark 2 to Audio Research LS15 to Classe 2200 Power amp and Kef 104/2 speakers.
My initial impression is that the AU74 is warmer then the MIT's... Easy to live with. My description would match the web site.
I wrote down... the MIT's seem to have a bit more base extension and are clear.. also very easy to live with the MIT's.
Getting the impedance match was critical... they were awful at Medium impedance... Very nice at High impedance.... (This matches the Pre Amp spec as well)
The MIT's seem to be a bit more effecient then the Snynergistcs. eg... a click or two on the pre amp to match volumes.. (wild ass guess on the level mathces here)
This got me wondering if the impedance matching of the synergistics is not quite right for my gear?