James Randi vs. Anjou Pear - once and for all

...by the way, i returned the anjou pear interconnect to the manufacturer.
Mrtennis (Threads | Answers)

Okay. We'll assume that you didn't like them.

Tbg, I knew there was someone making ribbon SCs. It is convergent evolution. There was a reason why I used Saran wrap. It touches the copper only in a few places, being very baggy. I knew that was important due to listening tests. The wide ribbon, on the other hand, was revelatory.

Brizonbiovizier, no one needs to prove anything to someone else. We all make our own buying decisions. I my case I buy what I think sounds good. Why would you think that someone needs to prove anything to you?

Brizonbiovizier's point about sighted tests is an important one.

If you take away the visual cues then much of the fanciful amazing properties of one cable versus another disappear as Mike Lavigne found out (much to his credit for doing a blind test and advancing his understanding of the true magnitude of cable differences, which is ever so small).

Those spending $1000 to $7000 or more on speaker cables would do well to conduct some blind tests and put their own convictions to the test (wife or friend can help). I assure you that many of you will be just as surprised as Mike Lavigne was.

As for those spending $50 to $200 cables it hardly seems worth the bother to go to blind tests or trying to show others that what they hear is influenced by what they see.

BTW- Absolutely Nobody is immune from visual cues or rave reviews that predilect our thinking...we ALL suffer from this. I suffer from it with ATC speakers...I read about all those mastering engineers, grammys and prestigious studios and I am predilected to think ATC must be something special. They do sound nice no doubt. A bit too forward sounding for some and I respect those who feel that way because there are so many great speakers out there. I know for sure that I am influenced by their user list and AES participation and AES papers with regard to my respect for their quality - it ain't purely what I hear. This is why all serious medical research involves placebos.

brizonbovizier is fortunate he lives in england. otherwise i would be ready to submit to a blind test, with two pair of cables of my choice and a stereo system of my choice, to prove him wrong about cable differences.

however, is perception reality ?

if a difference is not heard does that mean that all cables sound the same ? does such a position apply to all phenomena ?

it is possibles that there are differneces which cannot be perceived. that does not mean they do not exist.