Update on parallel speaker wire connections.
As per your suggestions I have made some improvements to the method of connection of the wires to the speaker and the amplifier.
For the amplifier I was able to get the 8 AWG low frequency wire in the hole in the post of the binding post. So now the low frequency wire is a direct connection. Although I couldn't get both the low frequency and high frequency wires in the same hole, I now only have one banana plug in the binding post. I think the mechanics of this connection is better. (See photo.)
http://i447.photobucket.com/albums/qq199/ROVA_photos/New_640_-4.jpg
The speaker connections proved more of a problem. The hole in the binding post of the speaker was too small to get the 8 AWG wire in it. I came up with an unusual solution that solves several problems at once. I split the bare wire strands into two roughly equal groups. I then twisted each group. I brought the twisted groups up on either side of the binding post. I then crossed the groups over on the far side of the binding post. I crossed the groups a second time and then fed the groups on either side of the second, upper, binding post. On the top side of the second binding post I twisted the groups back together into a single bundle. To this single bundle I added a twist-on wire nut to (a) keep a little tension on the wires on the top side of the upper binding post and (b) keep all the loose strands neat, together and insulated. I was then able to tighten the binding post nuts down quite snug.
http://i447.photobucket.com/albums/qq199/ROVA_photos/New_640_-1.jpg
By doing this I have much better electrical contact to the binding post from the wire. Also, I am able to add the recommended stranded jumper wire without adding anything new to the mix (it is the same copper as the main speaker wire and in fact an extension of the main speaker wire).
Finally, as with the amplifier, I had to add the high frequency wire via standard banana plugs. But again, with only a single plug per binding post the mechanical loading is much better.
http://i447.photobucket.com/albums/qq199/ROVA_photos/New_640_-3.jpg
Did this bring another night-and-day improvement? Unfortunately no. However, I would say there was a minor improvement in the bass response. Also, it seems like the sound is delivered with more ease. It is the same basic sound as before but it is like there is no strain or harshness to the musical at all.
The fact that there was no large improvement this time is not a surprise to me. I had such a big improvement with the parallel, flat cable/standard cable connection that I thought I must be getting most of the benefits of the wiring. However, any little improvement is welcomed!
Regards,
Rod
p.s. Let us all know if you try this and it works well for you!
As per your suggestions I have made some improvements to the method of connection of the wires to the speaker and the amplifier.
For the amplifier I was able to get the 8 AWG low frequency wire in the hole in the post of the binding post. So now the low frequency wire is a direct connection. Although I couldn't get both the low frequency and high frequency wires in the same hole, I now only have one banana plug in the binding post. I think the mechanics of this connection is better. (See photo.)
http://i447.photobucket.com/albums/qq199/ROVA_photos/New_640_-4.jpg
The speaker connections proved more of a problem. The hole in the binding post of the speaker was too small to get the 8 AWG wire in it. I came up with an unusual solution that solves several problems at once. I split the bare wire strands into two roughly equal groups. I then twisted each group. I brought the twisted groups up on either side of the binding post. I then crossed the groups over on the far side of the binding post. I crossed the groups a second time and then fed the groups on either side of the second, upper, binding post. On the top side of the second binding post I twisted the groups back together into a single bundle. To this single bundle I added a twist-on wire nut to (a) keep a little tension on the wires on the top side of the upper binding post and (b) keep all the loose strands neat, together and insulated. I was then able to tighten the binding post nuts down quite snug.
http://i447.photobucket.com/albums/qq199/ROVA_photos/New_640_-1.jpg
By doing this I have much better electrical contact to the binding post from the wire. Also, I am able to add the recommended stranded jumper wire without adding anything new to the mix (it is the same copper as the main speaker wire and in fact an extension of the main speaker wire).
Finally, as with the amplifier, I had to add the high frequency wire via standard banana plugs. But again, with only a single plug per binding post the mechanical loading is much better.
http://i447.photobucket.com/albums/qq199/ROVA_photos/New_640_-3.jpg
Did this bring another night-and-day improvement? Unfortunately no. However, I would say there was a minor improvement in the bass response. Also, it seems like the sound is delivered with more ease. It is the same basic sound as before but it is like there is no strain or harshness to the musical at all.
The fact that there was no large improvement this time is not a surprise to me. I had such a big improvement with the parallel, flat cable/standard cable connection that I thought I must be getting most of the benefits of the wiring. However, any little improvement is welcomed!
Regards,
Rod
p.s. Let us all know if you try this and it works well for you!