XLR interconnects?

Isn't it interesting that there will be new releases of the Beatles catalog.
They will be mostly using the UK mono mixes.
Have a listen Kijanki,and then tell me those masters were inferior.
The lps and cds that were available to the North American market were gross.
Kijanki, there were many things from the past that are as good or better than today.
Art Dudley from Stereophile is having a love affair with old turntables and 78 rpm records and there are some new/old cartridges based on 50's designs.

Old analog TV is not better than HDTV.
The Europeans were way ahead of North Americans, they have had it for years.
Now if you want to question why some people feel things from the past are better,ask yourself why you still measure the world in ounces, feet and inches and miles and the rest of the world does not?

You have a lot to learn, I understand where you are coming from.Perhaps you need to hear some good lps played on some good vinyl set ups.
You are obviously young and I am old, so you are at a disadvantage.
I was there as a musician when amps went from tubes to solid state,and back to tubes if you didn't notice.
Those old Vox amps are much sought after for the distortion (when you want it)and for the tone.As are old pre CBS Fender amps.
People today love the sound of SET,low powered tube amps, that are based on tube circuit designs from the 20's and 30's and that's before my time.
Technology is a wonderful thing, but it serves no use when it takes the life out of the music.
Maybe when you get a few more years into this hobby and experience some of the oldie goldies you'll see where I am coming from.

Lacee -

Saying things like "you're obviously young" or "you have a lot to learn" is immature and rude.

I don't know what gave you an idea that I'm young. I hope you don't claim to be older just to give more weight to your statements - that would be plain silly.

You keep repeating "based on 50's design" - it does not mean they performed the same. Everything around us is based on some older designs - but most of the time is better. The duty of design engineer is to obsolete existing designs/production.

Somehow you claim that Europeans are "way ahead" in recording and technology. What you fail to understand is that there are valid reasons for everything and HDTV mentioned by you was later in US because of government requirement that proposed standard has to be broadcastable in HDTV by air (not true in Europe). Because of this requirement everybody has free access to digital television. Telephone standards like CDMA (spread spectrum) are ahead of European GSM. Just look where progress of technology happened - University of Chicago alone has over 80 Nobel prize winners with more than half of it in Physics and Chemistry. Look where companies like Analog Devices, Texas Instruments, IBM, Motorola etc are located. When I was young and build my EL34 guitar amps I had to translate things from German language since German companies like Telefunken, Siemens, Grundig were dominating. Today US took over and companies like Telefunken went bankrupt (Vishay bought them). English is dominating in technical field and companies like Siemens have engineering meetings in Germany conducted in English (my friend attends).

As for measurement in inches, feet, and ounces - there is nothing wrong with it - especially now when computers handle everything. UK still uses lbs, ounces, inches and to make it even worse other units like "stone". Show me how does it stop progress of technology.

As for quality of recordings - I listen to Beatles "Love" reissue and it is very well recorded - but still does not compare to new digital recordings.

Yoy're saying that there are many things from the past that are better than today. Can you name a few? - Things that nobody was able to make better (but not TT cartridge since I would have hard time to find modern "mono" cartridge to compare). Maybe some cell phones that were made better in 50's than today? How about better quality laser printers in 50's?

Lacee - what you said about Europeans being ahead of US in HDTV having it for years is not exactly true.

First standard program (other than test transmissions) HDTV transmission in Europe happened in January 2004.

I bought my HDTV TV in 2001/2002 and since then I had HDTV only (whole day) broadcast on CH 11-1 (PBS) plus other channels about 50% HDTV. It is more than 3 years before Europe and as I mentioned HDTV is broadcast over the air here.

It has nothing to do with XLR cables - subject of this thread - sorry Darrenmc

I shouldn't have said that the Europeans had HDTV before North America.
What I meant to say was that the European television transmission technology was superior to ours.
The signal was clearer and cleaner in most of the modern Euro countries than what we ever had in North America prior to HDTV.
If you had travelled there you would know what I mean.

And I am old, 60 years old,and I have been in this hobby for almost 40 years, so there are a lot of things that aren't news to me, but I know there is much to be learned also.

I think there are better connectors than XLR,and in my experience the differences in quality of XLRs from Soundcraft to Neutrik to Xhadow is quite evident.

BNC would be better, and sraight soldered connections the best.
How do I know?
Because I direct solder most of the time.

The more connectors you get rid of the better.

By the way, they are re-releasing the original Beatles catalog from the original master mono English tapes.
When they come out have a listen and you'll know what I have been talking about.

I am not a vintage junkie, but some things just haven't really been surpassed.
The Quad 57 mid range,is still something that most modern day speaker designers are trying to emulate.

Some things you don't mess with, like Coca Cola.

Lacee - I'm 56 but most of my experience relates to electronics. Audiogon is an opportunity for me to learn more.

"Because I direct solder most of the time." I agree to get rid of connectors when possible but soldering introduces another metal - AQ micro-welds their cables.

TV in Europe before HDTV was better because Europe was late. They adopted same system but with more horizontal lines (625 I think). When color TV started they improved NTSC (read: Never Twice Same Color) by adopting PAL. PAL never changes color like NTSC does. Now only about 8-10% of households in Europe have HDTV while in US it is 55%.

Our conversation prompted me to learn more about Beatles and recording techniques. First two albums they produced were pretty bad recorded on BTR (British Tape Recorder) - 2 track thing that was remake of German war era recorder. Later they switch to 4 track Studers and later to 8 Tracks.

Not only equipment but also recording techniques improved. At one point Paul was using speaker as a microphone to make his lousy sounding violin bass (Hoffner) sound more punchy. Violin bass is unfortunately very short scale and won't sound punchy - no matter what. For that they had to go to Rickenbacker bass (I thing starting in Paperback Writer).
I'm not sure how much of bad sound is equipment and how much recording but even remastered pieces don't have clarity of best today's efforts. I don't question that sound might be surprisingly good but later Beatles recordings will be proportionally better.