Single-wire biwire versus single-wire plus jumper


My speakers have separate tweeter and mid-bass connectors, like so many do. I assume that shotgunning separate single-wire runs from amp to upper and lower is best (although this may be controversial). But I don't want to pay for double runs of this expensive cable and anyway it would look a bit messy.

I had been planning to run single wire to the mid-bass drivers and then jumper to treble.

This speaker manufacture offers the option of having a Single-wire run terminate in bi-wire at the speaker side. This eliminates the need for a jumper, but it means that the gauge of wire that arrives at the mid-woofer will be smaller than a pure single wire run with jumper.

What do you think? No audible difference? Huge difference? Ever tried both and compared?
Thanks,
Art
artmaltman
I have done both, using mono-block amps with short biwire and single wire with jumpers. Like you I don't want to pay for two lengths of Cardas GR. It is arguable which is better anyway, depends on your system. I would suggest running your speaker wire to the TREBIL rather than the mid-bass. Counter intuitive but after doing it the other way for some time I saw this suggested on several forums and found it works better for me also. Costs nothing to try.
Single wire to the highs, then jumper to the bass was suggested to me a number of years ago by Stuart Marcus of Vampire Wire. I've since seen it illustrated that way in the hookup diagrams for Tannoy speakers. I've suggested it to others ever since.
Have you contacted the MFGR or a dealer of those speakers and see if they have a preference? It may depend on amplification or some other variable. I like to question the designer if available for such queries. Let us know what you find out.