I first want to second the comments by Dave (Corazon) about the quality and value of many of the posts in this thread. While it is of course not expectable that a clear consensus will be reached, or that many minds will be changed by the debate, it seems clear that more than a few of the posts above are potentially of uncommonly high value, to both protagonists and readers, compared to those that typically appear in threads devoted to cables, and especially to power cords. If only by virtue of stimulating and broadening each persons thinking.
A question for Doug: In your several references to the value of testing with complete sets of cables from the same manufacturer, are you referring to complete sets of just power cords, or to sets comprising power cords, speaker cables, line-level interconnects, and perhaps also phono cables. If the latter, then I not only find your arguments to be technically plausible, but even expectable. As I indicated in a post earlier in this thread, IMO extrinisic technical factors relating to cables which conduct analog signals can easily explain the existence of sonic signatures, that will be consistent and predictable across multiple components and systems, obviously not in degree, but in kind.
Some examples: Speaker cables having low inductance will, everything else being equal, provide increased high frequency extension, to a greater or lesser degree depending on the speakers impedance at high frequencies. Lesser degree, of course, will include some cases in which the effect is audibly insignificant, especially if the cable is short. Interconnect cables having low capacitance will do the same, to a greater or lesser degree depending on the output impedance of the component driving the cable. Unbalanced interconnect cables having low resistance in their shield or other return conductor will reduce ground loop-related hum and/or high frequency noise that may tend to occur with electronic components in some setups, thereby improving background blackness and resolution of low level detail.
On the other hand, if your reference to complete sets refers to just power cords, then while I think your comments support your case much more persuasively than most others that tend to be encountered in threads dealing with this subject matter, and although I obviously am not in a position to question or doubt your extensive relevant listening experience, and although I certainly do not believe that generally recognized technical principles can come close to explaining all of our sonic perceptions, the combination of lack of convincing technical rationale which is inherent in that position, and what I perceive to be the major degree of technical counter-intuitiveness of that position, still leaves me skeptical (concerning consistency and predictability across multiple systems, as well as price/performance correlation, not concerning the existence of differences!).
Also, it should be kept in mind that comparison of multiple complete sets of power cords in a given system, at a given location, does not provide data points relevant to proving consistency or predictability of the effects of those cords across differing ac line conditions, including differences in line voltages, line noise, and line distortion conditions that are likely to be encountered at differing locations.
Best regards,
-- Al
A question for Doug: In your several references to the value of testing with complete sets of cables from the same manufacturer, are you referring to complete sets of just power cords, or to sets comprising power cords, speaker cables, line-level interconnects, and perhaps also phono cables. If the latter, then I not only find your arguments to be technically plausible, but even expectable. As I indicated in a post earlier in this thread, IMO extrinisic technical factors relating to cables which conduct analog signals can easily explain the existence of sonic signatures, that will be consistent and predictable across multiple components and systems, obviously not in degree, but in kind.
Some examples: Speaker cables having low inductance will, everything else being equal, provide increased high frequency extension, to a greater or lesser degree depending on the speakers impedance at high frequencies. Lesser degree, of course, will include some cases in which the effect is audibly insignificant, especially if the cable is short. Interconnect cables having low capacitance will do the same, to a greater or lesser degree depending on the output impedance of the component driving the cable. Unbalanced interconnect cables having low resistance in their shield or other return conductor will reduce ground loop-related hum and/or high frequency noise that may tend to occur with electronic components in some setups, thereby improving background blackness and resolution of low level detail.
On the other hand, if your reference to complete sets refers to just power cords, then while I think your comments support your case much more persuasively than most others that tend to be encountered in threads dealing with this subject matter, and although I obviously am not in a position to question or doubt your extensive relevant listening experience, and although I certainly do not believe that generally recognized technical principles can come close to explaining all of our sonic perceptions, the combination of lack of convincing technical rationale which is inherent in that position, and what I perceive to be the major degree of technical counter-intuitiveness of that position, still leaves me skeptical (concerning consistency and predictability across multiple systems, as well as price/performance correlation, not concerning the existence of differences!).
Also, it should be kept in mind that comparison of multiple complete sets of power cords in a given system, at a given location, does not provide data points relevant to proving consistency or predictability of the effects of those cords across differing ac line conditions, including differences in line voltages, line noise, and line distortion conditions that are likely to be encountered at differing locations.
08-20-11: ZaikesmanI didnt mention capacitance because I would not expect its effects to be quantitatively significant in a power cord application. Even if they were, I would expect those effects to only occur at very high rf frequencies, causing them to be, once again, unpredictable, inconsistent, and system and setup dependent.
though I did wonder why you omitted capacitance -- I'm sure you have a reason and will explain it
Best regards,
-- Al