Lissnr, it's not too late to collect a million dollars from Amazing Randi. No one has yet.
- ...
- 282 posts total
You say that only because the challenge requires fundamental scientific proof. http://www.randi.org/jr/121004science.html#11 |
hi rwwear: a a blind test only does not reject the null hypothesis. proof requires deduction, not listening. proof requires mathematics or logic. what you call proof is not proof of certainty or truth. you cannot say something is true because you hear it, or because 1000 people hear it. i don't reject what you say about blind tests and i will accept that people hear differences. i myself, own several after market line cords. my only point is that listening does not lead to knowledge. |
The evidence is NOT debatable when blind testing (as earlier described) proves with NO doubt, that different cables result in easily discernible and often dramatic differences in sound each and every time the swap(s) is/are made...each and every time properly identified...and are repeatable with dozens/hundreds/thousands of people...100% of the time. This now constitutes FACT.It would prove Linnrs claim Mrtennis and make him some money. |
- 282 posts total