Does anyone know of a non-digital sounding cd?


I have a couple of nice sounding cds that really don't come across as being so digital ( Diana Krall: Look of Love, and Eric Clapton: Unplugged ), and a few others. I just bought one tonite, and seemed a little too much digital, and it bothers me to plunk down $18. for it.
The ones I have, have good vocal presence, spaciousness, separation, and are very warm and lively, with very good soundstage.
It was 'Riding With The King': Eric Clapton / BB King. One vocal comes out of one speaker almost, and the other does the same, but only with the other speaker, and that same digital haze, with no real 3 dimensional imaging.
I have a Roksan caspian cd player, that can sound decent when it is playing certain cds, and can come across as a good sounding player, atleast it does to me.
I have been reading about xrcd. I would appreciate anyones
thoughts.
greggie
I agree with Jfrech. The Mapleshade label produces cd's that are very "analog sounding." The Chesky label also produces some great recordings without the digital edge. I have over a dozen XRCD and XRCD2's. I consider these very high definition sounding recordings. Some sound less digital, while others do not. A good example is Doug MacLeod's cd "Come To Find." It sounds as close as I have heard, to someone playing playing acoustic blues right there in the middle of my livingroom. Yet the XRCD of Neville Marriner and the Academy of St. Martin-In-The-Fields playing Rossini String Sonatas 1-6 is digital sounding; although the dynamics, soundstage and detail make this one of my favorite classical cd's.

Then again Twl hit the nail on the head.
There are lots of fine-sounding CDs out there now. However, I'm not a fan of Paul Spey's PZM-miced Mapleshades because of their phaseyness due to the PZMs. Reference Recordings are a lot more natural.
Thanks for your info. I have written most this down, and am on my way to the *Beat*, here in Sacramento to look for these.