sound difference MIT ORACLE AC1 vs ELROD vs PURIST


I am thinking to select one of the three on title.
MIT ORACLE AC 1, ELROD STATEMENT or PURIST DOMINUS.
i would like to know your suggestions on sound differences, if any.
my system is: mac mini/Cary 306 SACD as transports.
MIT ORACLE MA Digital
BERKELEY Alpha
MIT M1 IC
SPECTRAL 150S2
MIT M2 Speaker cables
KHARMA 3.2

thanks
caliaripaolo
I have 2 Statement Golds. One to the PS Audio Quintet and one to the dCS dac. Simply love them! Compared to the MIT Oracle AC-2 and AC-2, the MIT sounded thick and slow. The fact that the Elrod cables are not taken seriously in the audio press is proof to me that you can buy attention and that the pursuit of the best by reviewers is restricted to the field of friends and dollars (advertisement money).
finally I received the EPS-2 Signature.
This cable seams to be magic. I compared it to the Magnum AC and Elrod seems to give more depth and more body to the sound. The cable is connected to the Quantum QB8 Distribution. Kharma speakers seem, even more, disappear from the scene. Bass are much present and with greater impact. I reinserted the pre Spectral DMC15, in the chain, even though many people claim that the BADA go directly coupled to the Final. The result is magnificent.
Well Highend4me...you do not have to possess super hearing to discern the difference between a MIT Magnum AC and an Elrod ;-)
Caliaripaolo: Enjoy!!!
I echo the experience Caliaripaolo had. I have my EPS-2 signature from a dedicated line to my Signature DU-2 wired in ballanced mode and my other EPS-2 is from my Signal DU-5 to my amp. The neutral balance and weight of the music was very nice. It also opened up the soundstage quite a bit.
Dynamics are better also. More attack.
From what I understand, The Statement series is even better. I'm very pleased with the EPS-2's. I'm waiting for a EPS-3 to show up used to go to my amp.