Any advantages to bi-wiring speakers vs. single

Bi-wiring usually lets more cable reach your drivers...whether that's necessarily always a good thing depends on your speakers? I have found when I bi-wire with 2 sets of the exact same cable there tends to be overall improvement and what I like is using 2 different cables for each driver and in so doing I can tailor each cable "synergistically" with each (much like power cords or different I/C's in your system). My Silverline Sonata 2's were bi-wired as such, much to their benefit. My 2 cents.. (again).

I've had the VR 33's since 3/11 and opted for the bi-wire option so I could use them bi-amped. I really enjoy the speakers but now want to experiment with different wiring. Currently running the Speltz Anti Cables. I think the bass is definitely improved with it's own amp. Enjoy.

What amp are you using for the bass? And the mid and high?

I have an Exposure 2010s integrated running the mid-highs and the matching power amp dedicated to the bass. They are both rated at 75 watts and seem more than adequate if I choose to push them. My first venture into decent 2 channel in more than 20 years so I can't compare to any other system. I had Quad 22L2's beforehand but opted for the VR33's because I liked the idea of the speaker placement not being dependent on having to be so far out in the room. I also liked the fact of a 10" speaker for the bass and eliminating my subwoofer. Rooms and placement I'm sure will give a wide opinion of the speakers performance.

Danham, I was wondering whether to keep my JL Audio sub with the VR 33's? Do you get enough bass for eg, listening to jazz and rock? I don't listen to much pipe organ music so getting down to 20Hz is not an issue but a famous speaker designer and manufacturer told me never to believe the specs: that 30Hz really means 35 Hz and a well integrated sub is the best way to go. "Well integrated" is of course much harder to do than say.