WA-Quantum GmbH's Quantum Chips

Raytheprinter wrote,

"Does the fact that these artificial atoms have a ,,,empty hole where a nucleus is in a real atom as opposed a real nucleus make a difference?

The artificial atoms emit coherent light, unlike real atoms. It's a quantum confinement thing, I.e., Broglie wavelength. Like a CD laser (as I said before).

"Geoff, What is the name of this big company you work with?"

That's between me and my hairdresser.

Geoff,Thanks

Ok, I have had plenty of time playing with these chips in various configurations and now I am able to conclude that;

1. The fuse chips were a positive on every component that they were placed.

2. Chips at the circuit breaker are a plus. I use a cable chip on the main circuit breaker and 3 fuse chips on the dedicated breakers to my Audio system.

3. Large solid state Power Amps and perhaps Preamps benefit with Transformer and Large Capacitor chips.

4. The chips of any kind on digital equipment (except the fuse chips) suck the life out of the music.

5. On my system with my HIDiamond cables the cables chips were too over powering and flattened the image.

6. The speaker chips work pretty well, but the placement on your speakers matters.

7. Too many chips in the whole system can degrade the sound by flattening the images.

This is how the chips performed in my system, and I hope it helps anyone else interested in these chips to aid as a starting point for their system.

Ozzy, its good that you have not given up on the chips.

Baffling stuff, knowing they work, i still cant imagime how it will work on a piano.

There are 2 new chips, the power and semiconductor chips.

I have used both, together with a no risk trial of the whole range of these "stickers".

So far, negatives need rebalancing of the sound with other types of chips or tweaks. Keep an open mind and tweak on.

The ic chips in my palyers shows no ill effects as described by yourself. But agree that too many same chips in a system requires a rebalance of the Sound by tweaking elsewhere or using a different chip.

What is that i found each chip doesnt have a different characteristic. The flattening of the sound imho, the cable chips which are easiest to use can sound flat and overly smooth once you have a good number in the system.

With one cable chil on each cable didnt work for me, the last interconnect beside having them on all pc's flattened the sound.

Heres where the lower chip comes in, it sound more bombastic and fleshed out. Now when i reintroduce the last ic with the cable chip, brilliant!

Adding another power chip improved it further. Now came the 3rd and last power chip i had. It added further to the solidity, but now the staging sounds more closed in and vocal show some grain and hardness. Here where i add another cable chip to the ic and this smooths out the sound again.

In regards to speakerchips, specifically adding a capacitor chip on the woofers cap gave it better lows and shifting it where the midrange cap is located, the midbass improve, likewise a transformer chip at the location of the woofers inductor was nice as well. These were place outside the speaker know the specific location of the parts.

I didnt experiment much with the fuse chips, besides the cdp, they just went in and i didnt notice anything detrimental. Their effect is nice but smaller compared to the larger chip. Size does matter! Maybe 2 or 3 chips per fuse brings more benefits.

Now, how many more capacitor abd inductor chips to i need. Its crazy so far. I just keep ordering, the total on each order makes me think again as the price add up so quickly.

Now that my 2 channel system is satisfied and set with the chips, I now have turned to my home theater equipment.

My Denon Reciever has 6 fuses. I only have the small capacitor chips left, do you think they can take the place of the fuse chips? They really look physically the same.