Walker Audio Extreme SST


I don't believe it... I friggin' well don't believe it... But I hear it. Ann hears it.

Lloyd's new Extreme SST is yet another step better than the original SST (Super Silver Treatment contact enhancer).

This weekend was devoted to system tweaking. A "minor" turntable update that turned out to be HUGE, followed by experimentation with Walker Audio's new Extreme SST.

Some months ago we'd already used the original SST on our interconnects and speaker cables: WOW! The increase in resolution and clarity was palpable. Everything you may have read about how great this stuff is is absolutely true. Now Lloyd comes out with Extreme SST, which he says is "taking SST to a new level of wow!" So, okay, we'll try it. Lloyd's recommendations have a perfect track record in this household for being right on the money: I always start somewhat skeptical, only to be astonished yet again by that wizard of audio. This weekend's venture was to prove to be yet another trip down that path.

So, first a critical listening session with three system challenging music selections we enjoy. Then, all the old SST gets removed (it wipes right off with an isopropyl alcohol soaked Q-tip), then these same connections get treated with Extreme SST. Controlled test here: nothing else changed, no new connections treated, just the original connections for interconnects and speaker cables. Then we play two hours worth of music to let everything break in again before listening.

Now we sit down to play the three music selections we listened to at the outset of the process: the last few minutes of Stravinsky's Firebird (Dorati, Mercury/Classic Records), the very end of Mendelssohn's Symphony 3 (Scottish Symphony) (Maag, Decca/Speakers Corner), and the very beginning of Shostakovich String Quartet No. 8 (Borodin Qt, Decca/Speakers Corner). No talking: write down your impressions separately, compare only after all the music selections are over.

And when we share our written comments the results are virtually identical. Ann: "increased resolution, increased clarity." Rush: "increased clarity, resolution and staging specificity, somewhat cleaner leading edges to transients."

And this is on top of what the ORIGINAL SST delivered!

So what next? What else can you expect: the rest of the Sunday spent treating with Extreme SST every previously untreated connection, which includes phono cartridge pins, power cord connections, fuses, and every tube pin in this entire system (that's a lot of tubes here). Results: after two hours I'm beginning to get a sense of a system that sounds like the windows have been newly washed for dramatically improved clarity. It will take another several hours for the SST on the cartridge pins to fully break in, so even more will come.

Should you get Extreme SST? I dunno if it will be worth the extra cost to you over the original version. BUT YOU OWE IT TO YOURSELF TO USE ONE OR THE OTHER IN YOUR SYSTEM! The improvement SST provides is remarkable and should be part of every audiophiles system set-up procedure.
http://www.walkeraudio.com/sst.htm

For the other skeptics among us, here are links to other people's reviews and thoughts about Walker Audio's original SST:
Positive Feedback's Brutus Award and full review (David Robinson)...
http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue16/brutus04dr.htm
http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue13/walkeraudiosst.htm
6moons.com Blue Moon Award (Srajan Ebaen)...
http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/walker3/SST.html
Stereo Times (Clement Perry)...
http://www.stereotimes.com/acc092704.shtm
Enjoy the Music (Bill Gaw)...
http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazine/viewpoint/0304/aachapter54.htm
.
128x128rushton
"after time the sound disintegrates" so I ask, after how much time?

I've just spent quite a few months"clean",and just reapplied ESST to a couple of IC"s at the component end,not the RCA pin.

I would have to say that "clean" compared to ESST,the clean version is not as good.

The first thing I noticed was a lack of glare using the ESST.

So for awhile it seems I'll be enjoying the process.

If I have to clean the contacts and re-apply that's no big deal,like I stated, I do this twice a year.

Which is why I asked the question-how long does it take for the ESST to loose it's potency.

I really wonder if it's not just the old-"any change is a good change" setting in.

Which is when we grow accustomed to the "sound" and then do something and notice what we claim to be an improvement, but is really just a change.

Ebm and Sksos1,specifically what did you hear that prompted you to say it sounds worse after awhile ?

Also, what difference did you notice when you cleaned it off.

My take is that just cleaning the connectors a couple times a year always made for a difference in sound,even without re-applying the ESST.

That's what I have been doing for almost a year now.

But applying some ESST again, my system does sound better than without it.

I just wish I could source some of the "magic"oil.
I've got lots of the paste left over, and ,yes, I seal the cap with electrical tape.
Post removed 
Lacee, the "magic" oil one can use to refresh a jar of E-SST if it begins drying out is canola oil. But only a couple or three drops. Canola oil is NOT the base used by Walker Audio in manufacturing E-SST, but Lloyd says to use it SPARINGLY to refresh as described.

I've used SST and E-SST for more than 10 years. I notice NO degradation over time in my system (which is pretty reasonably "high resolution"). I do clean all of my contacts as part of regular maintenance about once per year, but have also waited 18 months or longer. I have never felt there has been any degradation in sound quality over time.
.
Thank you very much Rushton for the Canola tip.
My findings are the same as yours.