Neil Young's Pono music player raises millions

Nice start and I wish them well, but the real question is what will the selection and the pricing be like and then will it sell in any kind of numbers.

If you believe the Apple buzz, they are ready to release HiRez iTunes since all their masters are either 24/96 or 24/192 and they would have a superior library to PONO.
But do any of their devices support a HiRez format?

And for the counter reaction:
http://thehighfidelityreport.com/pono-fiat-music/

Remember when everyone thought that the WALKMAN was the greatest thing? Didn't take long for that to go the way of the Dodo Bird. Oh yeah, what about those DAT players and mini discs! Snooze.

Four to six years from now you will able to stream any resolution you like from the "Cloud" and you will be kicking yourself for buying into a temporary technology.

The Cloud is the end game, not a portable player out putting upsampled files that are not really very high quality, just re-packaged analog files.

Don't get fooled into thinking that any of these new venues/suppliers are giving you anything that is even close to a Hi-Resolution music file. The so called 24/96 and 192kHz Masters that Pono/HDTracks/Apple and others promote are only "up sampled" from analog tape. These are the same Masters that have been around for decades. Every few years they get a bug up their ass and re-issue to the masses the same old compressed and low resolution music they have the rights to.

Do you really think the Stones, Beatles, Floyd, Monk, Coltrane, Sinatra, Evans, Basie etc, etc. recorded anything over 14-16 bit? Let alone 24/96kHz! Yet these Flim Flam promoters want you to believe that they have files that will produce music in the ultra sonic realm.(22kHz or more for hi res) all they have done is increased the file size (adding eight zeros to increase the word lenth from 16 to 24) but not the resolution. You cannot get high frequency music to magically appear when artificially up sampled when it was never on the master to begin with. IMPOSSIBLE! This whole diversion/misdirection borders on being a criminal act.

Even the new music which might be done with digital workstation is highly compressed and down sampled for release to a 16 bit 44.1kHz resolution.

There are only a handful of true sources that record and master in true 24/96 or 24/192 and DSD. THEY ARE NOT PARTICIPATING IN THIS MOVEMENT WITH Apple, PONO, Sony, etc. They are audiophile labels that produce music that the masses have never heard of, by bands or groups/individuals that are unknown, except by us audiophiles. If they listened, they would probably think....what is this crap!

IMO, the broader public and the major labels really could care less about the small audiophile market that can and would appreciate what a Hi-Resolution system can sound like and only a limited amount of people are willing to spend the money to support it.

All of this is just a big money grab by the major labels and a few well connected individuals and manufacturers to sell the same old music and the newer compressed low fidelity music wrapped up in the debatetable (insert buzzword) hi res, hdaudio, high definition, Super Hi Rez, blah, blah blah format.

How many times are we supposed to re-buy our music collections and the sound may not be any better. Now you won't even have the physical media to hold onto and possibly re-sell if you don't like it.