The Arm/Cartridge Matching Myth


When I began my journey in high-end audio 36 years ago….no-one ever wrote about arm and cartridge matching nor tonearm resonant frequency…?
Over the last 10 years or so…this topic has become not only ubiquitous, but has mutated beyond its definition, to THE guiding principle of matching cartridge to tonearm….❓❗️😵
The Resonant Frequency can be calculated using a complex formula relating Tonearm Effective Mass to the cartridge’s Compliance….or it can be simply measured using a Test record of various frequency sweeps.
The RECOMMENDED Resonant Frequency of any tonearm/cartridge combination is between 8-12Hz.
But WHY is this the recommended frequency and WHAT does it really mean…?

The raison d’etre of this Resonant Frequency…is to avoid WARPED records inducing ‘resonance’ into the tonearm…..
Say what…❓😵
WARPED records….❓❗️
Yes…..ONLY warped records❗️😎
But doesn’t it have any meaning for NORMAL records…❓
None whatsoever…..😊👍
Let me explain….🎼

A badly warped record induces the tonearm to rise and fall rapidly on the ‘sprung’ cantilever of the cartridge.
Depending on the severity and frequency of this warping…..a subsonic frequency between 2-5Hz is induced so if your tonearm/cartridge Resonant Frequency dips into this frequency range….it will begin resonating and thus miss-track and/or induce hum through your system.🎤
Keeping the lower limits of your tonearm/cartridge Resonant Frequency to 8Hz simply insures against this possibility.🎶

So what about the 12Hz upper limit…❓
This simply insures against the possibility of any ultra low-level frequency information which MAY be on the record, also inducing this same miss-tracking or hum. For instance if your tonearm/cartridge Resonant Frequency was 18Hz and you had an organ record or one containing synthesised bass going down to 16Hz…..your tonearm may miss-track or you MAY develop a hum❓😢

So how many badly WARPED record do you possess…❓
I have three out of a thousand or so……and have NEVER experienced miss-tracking or hum even on these three…❗️😍

Yet these days….everyone (without exception it seems)…even tonearm and cartridge designers….happily follow the dictum of this Arm/Cartridge MATCH as if it affected sound quality…..❓
This Resonant Frequency has ZERO affect on the sound quality of a particular tonearm/cartridge combination and I have proved it hundreds of times with a dozen different arms and over 40 cartridges.

The best match for ANY cartridge ever made….is simply the very best tonearm you can afford…whatever its Effective Mass…😘
128x128halcro
Picture Ella Fitzgerald focusing her voice on a crystal goblet. She finds the resonance frequency of the goblet and then sings holding that frequency steady. The glass responds to that input. The goblet starts to ring and the amplitude builds until the glass shatters. All with the relatively small energy input of her voice.
I don't believe Ella ever managed to do this...❓😎
In fact....there is only one scientifically recorded instance of the human voice ever being able to do this under controlled conditions....and the SPL needed to succeed was greater than 110 dB...😱🎵
Incidentally...it is not the glass itself that reaches its Resonant Frequency.....it is the VOLUME of the glass with water that allows the Resonant Frequency to be raised to a level where it is audible....remember playing tunes on the rims of differently filled glasses....❓😎
Hi Tony,
The tonearm/stylus was cycling at 16 Hz while playing a record. It was interesting to see. Long term it would have worn out the stylus for sure.
For this to occur...a 16Hz tone had to be created either on the record, by the warp or off-centre disc...or via structure-borne feedback..❓👀
If your arm is 'moving'....you have a problem...😱
If your arm is not moving up and down or from side to side....whatever your Resonant Frequency may be....you don't have a problem and there will be no excessive wear on the stylus...😃🎶
Ralph,
The FR-66 is not a "very high-mass" tone arm- although its on the high side for sure, but not 'very' high.
I think you are mistaken....👀❓
The FR-64s is listed on Vinyl Engine with an Effective Mass of 35Gm..so a figure of 40 Gm for the FR-66s is quite believable...❓😱
I've trawled through the Data Base on Vinyl Engine and can find no arm ever made that comes even close to these figures...😫❗️
Here are the highest masses of tonearms I could find on the Database:-
SME Series V...Mass=10/11
SME 3012R=14
VPI JMW Memorial 9 Signature=9.5
Zeta=16
Technics EPA250=14
Roksan Artemiz/Tabriz=9
Linn Ittok LVII=13.5
Dynavector DV501=25

Here are the Compliance figures for some of the cartridges I have used on the FR-66s:-
Shure V15 Type III Compliance...22.5
Signet TK7SU....30x 10-6cm/Dyne
Acutex LPM 312 III STR....24
Acutex LPM 420 STR...42
Empire 4000D III....30
That makes me think of something: Is it only me or do others try not to cue the needle in the middle of the record? I have this feeling that dropping the needle, even ever so slowly in the middle of the record will leave some minor damage in the groove. So I tend to cue at the beginning and let it play through to the track that I want to hear. Is that a pointless exercise?
I've never thought about this before....and now you've got me thinking about this....❗️😱
STOP....⭕️🔙❌🚫
Harold NTB,
You mean the Luckydog eff mass calc? Copy the URL:
www.luckydog.demon.co.uk/images/EMC.xls
search and open the document. You should find everything from VTF to counterweight distance. Luckydog is a physicist who happens to like records.
Maybe you should send it to Stephen Hawking for a second opinion. How about a mechanical engineer?
http://www.audioasylum.com/cgi/t.mpl?f=vinyl&m=164890

For some reason I couldn't get either of your URLs to work. It might have something to do with the space-time continuum, or perhaps a glitch in my internet connection or that pesky virus.
Regards,