Audio Research transistor gear vs. tubes

Sorry to follow-up my own post...but I forgot to mention the CD-2..as an example. This CD player is holding an amazing % of it's retail price on the used market compared to almost all other used players....and it is transistor. How can, or why do, audio consumers think so highly of this unit..and not of the transistor pre-amps or power amps?

The 100.2 is an amazing amp. I have compared it to the Audio Research VT100mk2 tube amp costing $5000.00 and I liked the 100.2 better. This amp has all the liquidity of the best tube amps without the high cost of those amps. I don't understand why the audio press has not picked up on this great amp. This amp also excells in resolution and detail. It sounds great at both low and high volumes. Highly recomended.

I disagree with Slowhand. While I think the 100.2 is a fine product, none of ARC's solid state products compare with their vacuum tube equipment. Very big difference in terms of air, timbre and warmth. Ask any ARC dealer, they should concur.

I have had both solid state and tube ARC gear and say without question the solid state equipment of late is both excellent and albeit a bit different but not inferior to it's tube counterparts. More important is system synergy and choice of cables, conditioning and such.

I haven't heard the later ARC solid state but their older stuff(D-200 D400) didn't hold a candle to their tube gear of the time in direct comparisons, the Classic series which are my least favorite ARC tube products. Would certainly like to hear for myself but can't imagine any solid state sounding like tubes especially, as Jtinn states, in the area of air, timbre, and midrange presence. But I have heard great things about the 100.2 and reserve judgement until I hear for myself.