Will adding 5-ch amp to receiver make a difference

Yeah you already have a dynamic advantage with your sensitive Klipsch speakers! Even though receivers are dynamically at a dissadvantage, your Klipsch's help out tremendously! But, you still will increase dynamics even more, and add much more to other parts of the soundquality across the board in general in my experiences. Even if you found something like a very good used Acurus 125 X 5 amp (which is impossible to beat for the money, and more than enough for your applications), you'll still get huge sonic advancements across the board. Easily 100% improvements over all! where your sound now is likely more 2 dimmensional and a bit BLAH sounding. I think those speakers would really like a better NEUTRAL SOUNDING power amp like the Acrus. There are other amps to consider. But I think you should stay with sound like ATI, Acurus, or even adcom with those rather WARMISH tonal balanced speakers. The Parasound HCA855 is dirt cheap at like $300 used, and will still outperform your Rotel receivers amps! Also, the even better sounding HCA1205a will make a good choice overall, especially if you run your speakers as "small" on your receiver...which you should. Still, it's hard to beat that Acurus 125x5 for the buck with your speakers!. And, for like $500-600 used, you can find at least something like the Acrus 125X5 or 200X3, which would really help your sound!
Good luck

My concerns are more with music than with HT.I listen to a lot of rock and find most cd's are not involving and take on a edgy sound not to my liking.There are other discs like Steely Dan's Two Against Nature,Dire Straits Brothers in Arms,Donald Fagan's The Nightfly and Fleetwood Mac's Greatest Hits to name a few that I really like maybe because they were recorded better but mostly because I like the way they SOUND.I think some cd's just sound better than others and those are the ones that find the most playback time on my cd player.Now if I could add a beefier 5-ch amp to my system and improve the sonic signature across the board, I'm all over that!I was just wondering if someone else out there has made this upgrade and could explain the improvments in doing so.All comments are greatly appreciated. Thanks to all!

I am an advocate of the following axiom: "If you ask the wrong question you might get the right answer to the wrong issue."

This is my question to you:

Why would you want to listen to music with a HT receiver?

Really...you could do *much* better with a tubed CDP like the Ah!, a small Creek integrated amp, a decent power filter and a used isolation transformer from eBay.

"You're right, Psychic, but what about movies?"

Check out my 2 ch HT and you'll flip...those little Modwright Swans I've got are *extremely* holographic. In fact, I was talking to Dan Wright this afternoon and he told me he's setting up a HT in his house--a "2 Ch HT" using top of the line Swans Divas (modded by him, of course). Better two great sounding channels than five so-so...

POP UP THE VOLUME!!!

I have an opinion. Nobody has addressed the fact that the pre-section will be a limiting factor--no matter how pricey an amp you choose. In regular 2ch;does the pre not matter??--Works the same for HT as well. Dump the reciever;get all separates.