Need feedback on Classe amps

I would agree with Pops in that Classe' amps are "sturdy" and can drive difficult loads. My little Classe' 70 ( 75 / 150 / 300 wpc with 3 db's of headroom ) could easily drive some very low impedance / low sensitivity speakers that my Bryston 4B ( 250 / 400 wpc with 2 db's of headroom ) had a fit with. Just goes to show that not all amps are created equal when it comes to reactive loads, REGARDLESS of "ratings" or "specs". That is why so many of us stress system synergy and compatability. Sean
>

For what its worth, I auditioned the CAM350s in my system for an extended weekend driving Thiel CS7.2s. I found the sound to be engaging, vivid and dynamic. Less bland sounding then a CA300 I auditioned a few years back. I have auditioned the ML No.336 in my system. It has more body and weight then the CAM350s although I find the bottom end of the 336 to be somewhat heavy sounding (in my system and room). The CAM350s may be thinner sounding but maintain a nice tonal balance from the bottom up. Based on my experience with the CAM350s and some reservations I had with the No.336 I ended up with the Classe Omicron.

Tom, I'm considering a move from my Classe CA 300 to the Omicron. How would you characterize the Omicron compared to CA series amps and the Levinson?

Overall the Omicron is more refined and is fuller sounding then the CAM350s, yet it retains the CAM350s richly detailed and open midrange quality. The treble is more delicate and there is more detail resolution. It also sounds more effortless and powerful, with solid dynamics and good pace. The bass is a shade softer then the 336's, but its better balanced, and more limber sounding. Resolution and soundstage are also the equal, if not better, then the ML No.336. An easy recommendation for Thiel owners.