I have mixed thougths on MIT. I've used two of their products and both malfunctioned due, IMHO, to poor construction. However, sonically both cables were of very high quality. Cables are a tremendous profit center for both manufacturers and dealers. Forgive me for preaching, but most audiophiles spend way to much of their system's budget on cales. By the way, it's my understaning that most cables are customized rebrands of OEM product. But then again, I really don't see anything wrong with that. By comparison most loudspeaker companies don't actually make their own drivers.
MIT or MITH?
Just curious, if BEST, why so many for for sale? Audiogon has at least 20% MIT cable products, for sale. AudioAdvisor, out of 35 cable products, 29 are MIT. USEDCABLE 30% are MIT out of ALL Cable names.And all for 50% or more. Any comments about MIT company. "Scam artist" or real Inventors? And if you are in favor of MIT cables. Why? If you sold them? Why?
- ...
- 17 posts total
- 17 posts total