electro-harmonix vs svetlana tubes


I've seen the ads for electro-harmoicx 6L6 tubes allegedly better than RCA's (I strongly doubt that). I understand that they are Russian tubes. anyone have any experience with these as compared to the Svetlanas?
tubey
I was over to Brooks Berdan's place;(So CA) I'd not heard of the brand(making you second to mention them)-- Guess what tube he recommended for my RM9.2--- YUP E-H.

Ok,now this was for el34's-- I have a set of svets 34's-- Not my cup of tea;; Lacking in mid treble/ to the highest treble.Svets are flat up there;to me. Little more on the bottom,but not that much more. He never agrees with me/much; he did on this one.
The Electro Harmonix tubes are basically Sovtek.

The EH is the tube supplied in the Wolcott amps, and I have tried several tubes against the EH since buying the Wolcotts a couple of years ago. First, there is very little difference between the Sovtek and EH, the differences sited by Avguygeorge when compared to Svetlana is pretty much dead on. The other tubes to try are the Tesla E34 L, which is the best of this bunch, unless you can afford Mullards. Mullards are so much better than all of these that the discussion is ended when they are plugged in for the first audition.

Of course money is always a factor. The Tesla, EH and Sovtek are all similarly priced, the Mullards are expensive, even used.
I have a 300b push-pull amp and have tried both types.There is a very big difference in this type of tube and I'd assume this carries over to the other types of tubes .I feel and hear a more of the music whith the electro-harmonics,more depth more, I dont know .they just sound so good. I would like to mention another tube you may want to investigate they are called Full Music . I can't find there web address right now but if you do a search it should come up. Just my two cents like it or not