Fpeel, we have three choices. First, engage with 702, arguably letting him get our goats, but possibly driving the debate to some conclusion (eg. Jostler). Second, ignore him completely, thereby causing new (and other)posters here to be intimidated from posting any of their opinions, in fear of unchallenged attacks from the likes of 702. Third, not reply to 702's posts but vote against him.
I agree that there are problems with the first alternative. But I am more concerned about the second alternative as I have seen this outcome eventuate elsewhere and this forum therefore degenerate into the closed-minded talking to the closed-minded, getting solace from being right. The third option may be preferred by some, but I see it as the weasle's way out. If I disagree or disapprove, then I do not intend to hide behind the voting system.
Therefore, regardless of 702's motives, I feel the necessity to react to his contradictory position. If he, as you suggest, continues to post asinine comments here purely to feed his immature need to get a reaction then I reckon he will get a reaction until he grows up or goes away. If this feeds his need for attention, he is one very sick puppy, and most certainly not one that should be left to intimidate posters here.
