Power cord? Why?

Corona: As i previously stated, if this product is already for sale, people are ordering it, etc... WHY can't you provide at least a link to information on this product or materials that go into making this product ? Even if it only contains generic info that one would find in a "sales brochure", that would be better than the "NOTHING" that you have provided thus far. Sean
>

PS... We have had "wires" that have been called "superconductors" around for a relatively long period of time. These "wires" offer far lower resistance than any of those commonly used and do not require low temperatures for increased conductivity. While they may not be of the same levels being discussed here, they are MUCH better than anything that we are using for audio purposes. Problem is, these wires are PHENOMENALLY expensive per foot, are stiff as hell and require a very large bend radius. If someone were using wires like this as a base conductor for audio cables, i might be able to justify the "mega dollar" expenses involved in some of these "Salon" type cables.

Ok, have fun. If people are that gullible, you have every right to hook them. If the cable sounds better than others, then it will stand on its own merits regardless of the technology.

superconductors?

Nothing new really. However, the reason that superconductors are of great interest is for transmitting data, not for 60 cycle AC current. That's like saying you inted to put dual 250 hp. outboards on an 8 foot boat. Comon, lets not get star treky here.

Now, I hate to be smug here, but with all the discussion that's been going on here with Corona (and really, I wish that much Secret Agent research was being done in, say, petroleum alternatives than audiophile power cords), I think I'm getting much more musical enjoyment working through Keith Jarrett's "My Song" on the piano.

Mind you, an ACOUSTIC piano that doesn't benefit at all from a superconductor power cord.