Is computer audio a bust?


In recent months, I have had several audio acquaintances return to CDPs claiming improved SQ versus their highly optimized computer transports (SS drives, external power supplies, etc, etc).

I wanted to poll people on their experiences with computer "transports." What variables have had the most impact on sonics? If you bailed on computers, why?

I personally have always believed that the transport, whether its a plastic disc spinner or computer, is as or more important than the dac itself and thus considerable thought and energy is required.

agear
Because it will sound better with the Synchro-Mesh, that's why.

Bit-perfect is less important than low-jitter, and the resampling in the Synchro-Mesh is the best available now. Minimal impact on SQ.

It's 30-day money-back, less shipping, so the risk is low. If your system is resolving, it will make a big difference.

Steve N.
Empirical Audio
Cerrot, you obviously hold a strong opinion about the evils of bitwise imperfections versus those of jitter in this context... Please explain in detail. G.
He's just never heard a Synchro-Mesh with a good power supply, or a recent Off-Ramp for that matter.

These don't continue winning shootouts for no reason.

Yes, I've heard the Bryston with the same PCI Juli@t board that Carrot uses. Its very good, but my USB interface still beats it and so does Synchro-Mesh.

Steve N.
Empirical Audio
"Please explain in detail. G."

Guido, Cerrot has asked me to ask you to "shut up." He would have asked you himself, but he cannot spell "shut up."