Is computer audio a bust?

Resampling is never bit-perfect. There are good resamplers and poor resamplers. I use a good one. It has gotten lots of glowing reviews. I actually used to sell a non-resampling reclocker, the Pace-Car, but the source had to be synchronized to it. This means that the source had to have a word-clock input or have a master clock driven from the reclocker using mods to the source device. It is a complicated matter to do reclocking of S/PDIF without resampling, not as simple as you allude to. Even though the Synchro-Mesh resamples and is not bit-perfect, it still beats the older Pace-Car, which was bit-perfect.

Reasampling is a lot like EQ. EQ has always been a dirty word for high-end audio, primarily because the graphic equalizers that were first introduced were such low quality. With the advent of Amarra software, EQ is now not only good, it can elevate your system significantly.

Likewise, the Synchro-Mesh uses new technology that makes the non-bit-perfectness a non-issue. Lots of folks are using it with their CD transports and Sonos in particular, but even with their Squeezebox.

I'll bet it would make even your Juli@t sound better.

Steve N.
Empirical Audio

Thank you Kevinkwann, unfortunately your comment was not constructive. I suggest avoidance of ad hominem.

Hi Cerrot, I can see that potential of both bitwise defects as well as jitter introducing a variety of distortions.... It probably depends on the magnitude and distribution patterns of each. Is there evidence that bitwise imperfections are actually causing audible distortions in current builds of Empirical products? ... As I have not experienced Empirical in my own system, I have not formed n opinion on the subject.

Saluti, Guido

I have compared my own Off-Ramp 5, which is bit-perfect to the Synchro-Mesh, both being powered from the same high-quality DC supply. The SM is pretty close to the Off-Ramp 5, even though OR5 is slightly better. In many systems, the difference would not be perceivable.

Steve N.
Empirical Audio

"State-of-the-art CD transports vs USB/SPDIF converter shootout:"

http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f6-dac-digital-analog-conversion/state-art-cd-transports-vs-universal-serial-bus-industry-standard-cables-connectors-and-communications-protocols-between-computers-and-electronic-devices-spdif-converter-shootout-15193/

The results of above comprehensive comparison perfectly reflect my own impressions as well, albeit via different equipment and interface (but that'd only underline the generality of the matter at hand).

Notice the difference in price between the CD-transports and USB to S/PDIF converter + server used..

Hi Guido, EI do not believe you would not add a "synchro mesh" between a $30,000 CEC transport and a SOTA dac. Again, if you look at other manufacturers (Ralph comes to mind), they are here to teach and educate us. Not to tell us all our issues will be solved if we buy their products. That is solely my issue.