Have anyone pics and tech-data for a SU-1 step-up?


Hi !
I look at the web and can`t find pics and tech-data for a Expressive Technologies SU-1 step-up ! Google can`t help me ! Please help a guy from germany !!! I`m very intresting at this step-up ! Is it The Best ? My Analogsystem :
Player : H+P Ulysses
4tonearms : Ortofon RMA309,SME3012MK1,FR66s,Ikeda IT407
5cart: Ortofon SPU Royal GM , A/E , Gold GM , DL 103 ,
ZYX R 100 Fuji
Pre-pre: Ortofon T-100 , Denon AU-1000 , Denon AU-340 ,
Cotter MK II , Gryphon Head-amp
Pre-amp: Jadis JP 80
Thanks and PEACE FOR THE WORLD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Frank
frankfromgermany
Albert, would you please remind me what do you mean when you're taking about the Aesthetix. Do you mean a phonostage with 454 tubes 43 gain stages, a shit loaded of the so-call "audiophile parts" and sounding windy like a seashell form the Florida beach? I can give you a long list of the phonostages that must not be used with neither SU-1 not SU-2. Your experience with SU-1 was quite predictable.

Good luck in your pontification for AA’s excellence...

Rgs,
Romy the Cat
The person who promised to bring the Aesthetix back into my home only under a general anesthesia.
Romy, I will not waste my time answering a question that you already have enough attitude and opinion of to serve everyone at Audiogon.

I doubt you have done the audition I described, much less taken the time to evaluate on a high end analog system.
*** Romy, I will not waste my time answering a question

It was not the question that would require your reply.

*** that you already have enough attitude and opinion of to serve everyone at Audiogon.

Not quite correct. You serve them. I just point out the level of the “servants”.

*** I doubt you have done the audition I described, much less taken the time to evaluate on a high end analog system.

Comforting thought, isn’t it? Although, you are very correct: I DO NOT participate in the “auditions AS YOU DESCRIBED” because I find that your evaluation methods methodologically are bogus and produce totally abstract and not-conclusive result.

Have a good day.
Romy the Cat
No wonder you were thrown off of Audio Asylum. It appears you have nothing but venom to contribute.
Once again we are blessed with the bombast and utterly laughable displays of psuedo audio knowledge which is Romy. After his welcome has been fully exhausted on the Audio Asylum board, he now tries to establish his parasitic practices here on Audiogon. We know, we know, you treasure your ban from AA like a badge of honor. Some badge.

After reading Albert's post regarding the IO, I successfully imagined Romy's inevitable response nearly word for word. About all that remains is for Romy to throw up (as in regurgitate) a further post claiming that the A'gon "big brother" has edited or censored his post. Poor Romy, so oppressed, so misunderstood.

Actually the nature of your juvenile act is incredibly transparent, Romy. Troll the boards, pick out something to bash, then trot out outlandish statements which have neither a basis in fact nor, more importantly, supporting evidence of any kind.

Oh sure, continue to use your common rebuttal, which only resembles logic in that it is "pretzel logic". Vilify someone else's evaluation method as inferior to that which you personally employ, yet give not even a hint regarding your methodology. One would think you'd jump at the chance to "educate" us on how your approach is preferable, as superior an intellect as you obviously believe yourself to be. But no, you won't because you are all blow and no go. Wait, though, I'll save you the time of responding that we "underlings" don't deserve for you to spend the energy required to enlighten us. We know that you'd prefer to let us suffer in our bliss of ignorance. To quote Henny Youngman, "Please"! As in please leave us alone.

Surely you will find the time and energy to respond to this post, more than likely through the use of circular argumentation or inane reasoning. But, please, PLEASE, spare us the fake fracturing of the English language. In one post you can be seen to use completely correct syntax and structure. In another, you make yourself look like the poster child for ESL. It, and you, grow increasingly wearisome. I'd wager that the sound you claim to hear from the IO is not from "seashell on Florida beach" but, rather, the wind blowing, having entered one of your ears and subsequently passing, unimpeded, out the other.