To: Robert_sj from above. All audio components, esp. solid state, need burn-in time to some degree, and the CD-55 is no exception. Out of the box you can expect it (and most solid-state components) to sound thin, have little front-to-back depth and for the tonal balance to be mid-range heavy. The Sheffield/XLO Burn-in CD programed to tracks 6,7 and 8 and set on repeat...then run for 24 to 48 hours will get the burn-in process going...then run various music for a few more days..and you will be mostly there. If you only have the player for a couple of days..and if it was just out of the box, you will not really hear the player's capability (but this would be true for most solid-state products). I listen to a fair amount of live music and various types of music....however, in the end result, voices, strings, brass and woodwinds are what I use to decide if a sound is right by me. The human voice is a superb test for all audio gear. The Resolution (after burn-in) gets Diana Krall, Sarah Vaugh, Ella, Billie....etc. right. I believe the power supply and audio sections (as well as accuracy of the laser reading) are of prime importance. Many players sport name-brand/model# dacs but lack enough quality in the power supply/audio section/cd-drive-laser/and shielding to have much chance to sound real.
Resolution Audio CD-55..Past Threads...
I have read past threads about the Resolution cd players and enjoyed them a great deal.....both the audio/sound input that people had to share...and the emotional outbursts! Not meaning to fan the flames....but,.. I have owned many cd players, transports, dacs and digital interconnect cables over the last few years (including ML-39, Sony Xa-7ES, Classe CDP-1, ARC CD-2, cd transpords and dvd transports feeding various dacs..inc Bel Canto...and the list goes on), and in the end result, the CD-55 is as special as people say it is.
- ...
- 12 posts total
- 12 posts total